Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
One study found inverted J-shaped relationships between the intake of n-3 PUFAs and DHA and the risk of postpartum depression; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing the middle quintile with the lowest quartile showed borderline significance ( p = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively) (Miyake et al ., 2006 ).
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Women in Poland and Greece appeared less likely, while women in Ireland were more likely, to meet the WHO PA recommendations (borderline significance: p = 0.06 and p = 0.1, respectively; Fig 2 and S2 Table ). 30 min · d −1 PA recommendation When PA guidelines were defined as at least 3 0 min · d −1 of MVPA [ 5 ], prevalence estimates of meeting these guidelines were lower and ranged from 27.1% (Greece) to 46% (UK) for men and from 10.4% (Greece) to 25.6% (Ireland) for women.
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The ROC analysis was performed, and the results suggested that GLS equal to 14.5% predicts prolonged T1 relaxation time with the best combination of sensitivity (0.67) and 1-specificity (0.12), and borderline significance ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 2 ). 4.
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Thus, looking at these data and findings in our study, it seems that the likelihood that NRAS mutations will become a significant prognostic factor is dependent on the size of the cohort, since in all four cohorts consisting of more than 200 patients, including the ABCMML, NRAS mutations had a significant adverse impact on OS in three of them and borderline significance ( p = 0.06) in one cohort.
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The Nab response was also more potent in the women who were superinfected compared to those who were not (GEE, RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01–1.29, p = 0.031; Fig 1C ) and the point estimate was unchanged in the multivariate analysis, although with borderline significance (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.99–1.31, p = 0.06).