Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significanceP = 0.0591.2× alpha
Our adjusted analyses demonstrated that only the 1-month CAT score difference reached nominal significance after controlling for these confounders (adjusted P = 0.04), whereas the unadjusted analysis showed borderline significance ( P = 0.059) and other outcomes lost statistical significance entirely, a pattern potentially attributable to limited statistical power in this exploratory study.
borderline significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
The exploratory quadratic-term analysis for PTA at 8 kHz showed borderline significance for both the centered linear altitude term (β = 4.50, p = 0.059) and the quadratic term (β = −5.64, p = 0.061), suggesting that the relationship between residential altitude and PTA at 8 kHz may not be simply linear and may instead be non-monotonic ( Supplementary Figure S1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).
borderline significancep= 0.0591.2× alpha
While the allelic association of SNP rs4681767 showed borderline significance in the overall cohort (0.459 vs 0.336, OR 1.680, 95% CI 0.989-2.854, p= 0.059), a statistically significant association was observed in the SPS type II subgroup (0.535 vs 0.336, OR 2.272, 95% CI 1.217-4.240, p=0.011) ( Table 1 ).
borderline significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
In TCGA mass spectrometry data, the association of CDC42 protein expression and EGFR protein levels was validated (Spearman r = 0.25, p = 0.01); however, other associations were of either borderline significance (E-cadherin r = 0.19, p = 0.059, Ki67 r = 0.16, p = 0.099) or not significant (CK5/6 r = 0.003, p = 0.97).
Phenotypic characterisation of breast cancer: the role of CDC42.
Breast Cancer Res Treat · 2017 · PMC5487723
borderline significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
Although multiple factors were associated with shorter CRFS in univariate analyses, such as KMT2C mutations ( p = 0.019), de novo metastasis ( p = 0.020), AR pathway mutations ( p = 0.002), MAPK pathway mutations ( p = 0.001), PI3K pathway mutations ( p = 0.008), WNT pathway mutations ( p = 0.006), and total mutations ( p = 0.015), none of them remained the prognostic significance in multivariate analyses for CRFS (only KMT2C mutations and de novo metastasis displayed borderline significance; p = 0.059 and p = 0.067).
borderline significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.3787.6× alphaplainly factual
However, the difference in AST and ALP did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.378 for AST, p = 0.190 for ALP), while GGT showed borderline significance ( p = 0.059). 3.4 WQS regression The eight components that make up the LE8 score were evaluated for their impact on these liver function parameters ( Figures 3A – E ).