Similarly, bioavailable testosterone predicted MD reductions with borderline significance ( T = −2.02, p = 0.056, uncorrected), whereas no significance was present for total testosterone ( p = 0.25) and no significant predictions were observed for changes after 4 months of treatment.
Of these, 5 lines had significantly higher BV/TV in males than in females, and 1 line had 118% higher BV/TV in females than in males with borderline significance (p = 0.056).
In multivariate analysis, the level of distress at baseline was strongly associated with attachment anxiety (beta = 0.239, p = 0.03), and catastrophizing (beta = 0.241, p < 0.02), and there was a borderline significance with self-blame (beta = 0.181, p = 0.056), After Testing In a univariate regression analysis, the level of distress at T1 was associated with baseline distress (beta = 0.789, p < 0.001) and with all psychological traits (beta-values between 0.219 and 0.501, p -values ranging from 0.045 to < 0.001; see Table 2 ).
For women with no formal education (n = 108,846), the odds of receiving no ANC were 48% higher (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.64, p < 0.001), with borderline significance for 1–3 contacts (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.21, p = 0.056).
Age exhibited a borderline significance in relation to knowledge of the partner's blood type [X2(3,207)=7.550, p=0.056].
Using PANSS positive symptom, general symptom, and the total score as covariates, the covariance analysis revealed a significant difference in working memory capacity under four target loads between the groups ( F 1 = 5.153, P = 0.028), with borderline significance noted after adjustment ( P = 0.056).
Although APN level showed borderline significance for visual improvement ( P = 0.056), it did not reach the strict threshold for statistical significance.
The highest quartile (Q4) of lnNHHR was significantly protective in Models 1 and 2 (both P < 0.01), whereas this association attenuated to borderline significance in the fully adjusted Model 3 (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.44–1.01, P = 0.056).
Another specific concern is the borderline significance (p < 0.056) for the regression model that tested loadings on the first factor of the lifestyle model, likely due to a small sample size.
The risk had a borderline significance on Week 5 ( P = 0.056) and was significant again on Week 7 ( P = 0.009).
Grade of differentiation showed borderline significance ( P = .056).
For women, those working in education reported the highest LWE levels, although estimates reached only borderline significance ( p = 0.056).
Additionally, there was a tendency for patients with LVH to have higher occurrences of bothersome nocturia with a borderline significance (69.4% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.056) (Table 2 ).
In detail, TCZ-treated patients showed a significant decrease in FVC% both at T12 (β: −5.28, p = 0.019) and at T24 (β: −6.47, p = 0.04) with respect to T0, while, within RTX-treated patients, FVC% displayed a decrease in borderline significance at T12 compared to T0 (β: −5.22, p = 0.056).
The Pearson coefficients of correlation were significant for 5 of these 6 genes ( P value < 0.05) while the sixth showed borderline significance ( P value = 0.056); 2 were not correlated ( Nrt1.1 and Nr1 ) ( Fig.
Additionally, the pTAU-positive area decreased with borderline significance in conjugate-treated slices ( Figure 4 c, treatment, p = 0.056).
In addition, HSCT could significantly improve the outcome of CH-MDS-AML patients ( P < 0.001), while it showed borderline significance in the CH-AML ( P = 0.056) and other GF- group ( P = 0.067).
When corrected for T 2 decay, borderline significance was achieved (percentage lipid content, dutasteride: 0.58% ± 0.21% vs 0.75% ± 0.24%, P = .056; finasteride: 2.39% ± 1.25% vs 3.08% ± 1.72%, P = .37).
12.4%) with borderline significance (OR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.49–1.02; p = 0.056).
In contrast, sucrose interventions showed a stronger and more consistent effect across two comparisons, both reporting Hedges’ g values above 0.55 and reaching borderline significance ( P = 0.056).
Agency measures were correlated (with borderline significance) with two questionnaire scales; the affect ( r = 0.445, p = 0.056) and the embodiment measure of “Loss of Hand” ( r = 0.445, p = 0.056).
Mean HU measurements in said vertebrae were lower with borderline significance than in all other vertebrae 69.8 vs. 83 (P=0.056).
Restorative angle assessment and the influence on radiographic marginal bone levels Based on the restorative angle cut‐off (≤40°or >40°), the non‐parametric model for longitudinal data (Brunner‐Langer) revealed that from baseline to 5 years of follow‐up, the averaged marginal bone level (mesial/distal) depended on time ( p < .001) and angle (borderline significance; p = .056).
In the moderator analysis shown in Table 4 , there was a high magnitude adjusted odds ratio of 10.217 and borderline significance ( p = 0.056) for the relationship between mistreatment (proxy for obstetric racism) and worry about pregnancy and birth among respondents who agreed with this statement.
The DWI volume significantly correlated with changes in NIHSS score ( p = 0.002); FLAIR intensity demonstrated borderline significance ( p = 0.056); and DWI-FLAIR volume ratio showed no statistically significant association in this cohort ( p = 0.511).