“borderline significance”

Borderline significance, such as P = .055 were regarded as insignificant.

1a and Table 1 ), and in one out of 532 control samples (c.1642C > T; p.Gln548*, 0.2%), which points towards an enrichment in early-onset CRC cases compared to controls with borderline significance (OR = 8.67; 95% CI, 0.69–455.36; P = 0.05516).

Analysis via kappa correlation measure revealed that mutations in CHEK2 gene were associated with progressive disease with borderline significance (kappa = 0.1278, P = 0.05536; Table 1A ).

The median disease-free survival (DFS) was similar to median recurrence time, with borderline significance ( P = 0.0555; Fig. 8C ).

The comparison between Groups A and C showed no statistical significance (OR = 1.6010; p = 0.082). However, a borderline significance was observed between Groups B and C (OR = 1.3125; p = 0.0556), suggesting a potential increasing trend of the TA genotype in DN patients (Table 5 - see PDF).

With respect to disease-free survival, a borderline significance (HR 2.43; 95% CI 0.98–6.03; Cox P = 0.0556, log rank P = 0.0478) was demonstrated (Fig. 5 ).

CNBD and FT were significantly higher ( p = 0.0131 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and CTBD was higher, with a borderline significance, ( p = 0.0556) in the COVID-19 group compared to controls ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).

There was a borderline significance on the slope in CGI-S ( F = 3.716, df = 1,168, P = 0.0556).

Two of these were still associated with the disease after correcting for multiple testing (rs1545620, p = 0.0006, OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.16-1.53; rs7259292, p = 0.0031, OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.35-2.78) and one showed borderline significance (rs1457092, p = 0.0557, OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.06-1.40).

Of layers tested, only RPE morphology was related to dyslaminated ONL, as absent ( P = 0.0142) and reactive RPE ( P = 0.0557, borderline significance) were more likely to associate with ONL dyslamination than normal RPE.

DE NHPIs also had higher HF risks than Asians (HR = 2.081, p < 0.0001) and a borderline significance for IHD (HR = 1.701, p = 0.0558).

Furthermore, the Wilcoxon test showed that one-sided p values when comparing the methylation level in site 2 of TD, NTD and ND + NTD with HC group were 0.0038, 0.0252 and 0.0038, respectively; while TD also revealed borderline significance comparing with NTD (p = 0.0559).

Additionally, higher surrogate neutralizing capacity against the Omicron strain was noted to have borderline significance for the risk of breakthrough infection (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4, p = 0.0559).

Diseases-specific survival and overall survival analyses resulted in borderline significance between the high and low-risk groups with p = 0.0559 and 0.1387, respectively ( Supplementary Figures S2 and S3 ).

ADV revealed non-significant change in viral load when compared to LAM but borderline significance with LAM + ADV ( P = 0.056), while the association was significant with TDF, ETV and LAM + TDF.

Mean HU measurements in said vertebrae were lower with borderline significance than in all other vertebrae 69.8 vs. 83 (P=0.056).

rs850948063, which is in moderate-to-strong LD with rs24543691 in both breeds, also showed a similar effect size (OR, 1.66) but only borderline significance ( P = 0.056).

A borderline significance was observed in favor of government physicians who believed in the importance of involving patients in ADR reporting (p = 0.056).

2 d and f respectively) resulted in no significant change for SYS-IKL ( p = 0.400) and borderline significance for MOS ( p = 0.056).

There was a borderline significance for the comparison of frequency of LGA [10% (32) vs. 6% (19), p = 0.056] considering the groups above and below the median of TG respectively.

This trend only showed borderline significance for DFS (HR = 2.37; 95% CI, 0.98–5.37, P = 0.056).

13%) could represent a normal variant, although its borderline significance ( p = 0.056) warrants cautious interpretation.

After excluding SNPs strongly associated with traditional metabolic risk factors, the IVW estimate attenuated to borderline significance (OR: 2.383; 95% CI: 0.976–5.816; p = 0.056) ( Table S4 ; Table 4 ), suggesting diminished statistical support for a robust causal effect.

Of these, 5 lines had significantly higher BV/TV in males than in females, and 1 line had 118% higher BV/TV in females than in males with borderline significance (p = 0.056).

Regarding calcidiol, no significant associations were found with blood pressure; however, a similar trend with borderline significance was found between calcidiol and DBP in the UTI-male subgroup (r = −0.431, p = 0.056).