“borderline significance”

Conversely, patients younger than 66.5 years old reported higher LARS scores than older patients with borderline significance (P=0.051).

On average, older age at menopause achieved a borderline significance in breast cancer ( P = 0.051).

The overall model indicated borderline significance (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.051).

For the traditional section, however, the only significant predictors were prior GPA and ethnicity (note type was not analyzed for this section), although class standing showed a trend ( p = 0.073), and major had borderline significance ( p = 0.051).

Insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR was higher in IGT/IFG group, had shown borderline significance (p = 0.051), however, WBISI was not significantly different between late NGT and IGT/IFG.

Haemoglobin levels were slightly lower in patients with STEMI and CS, with borderline significance ( p = 0.051).

Notably, for active and moderate-to-severe TED in this binary approach, TG showed a borderline significance (OR=2.160, 95% CI 0.994 to 4.694; p=0.051).

1.22 ± 0.49, p = 0.027), with borderline significance for volume (223.19 ± 272.07 vs. 95.91 ± 126.53 mm 3 , p = 0.051).

Patients with advanced-stage UPSC who received combination therapy demonstrated a lower risk of local recurrence compared with those who received chemotherapy alone with a borderline significance ( P =0.051).

Group 2 showed a decreased survival probability with borderline significance when compared with group 1 (group 1: n = 153, group 2: n = 34, HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.63, p = 0.051) ( Fig. 4 A and Table 3 ).

Men reported low levels of support for FGC in response to the direct question, 8.3% (95% CI [5.4–11.1]) rising to 18.5% (95% CI [8.7–28.3]) in response to the UCT, (at borderline significance, p = 0.051).

As shown in Figure 2A,B , patients who received LRRT with or without bRT had statistically superior OS and PFS (OS: HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30–0.79, p = 0.003; PFS: HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41–0.80, p = 0.001) compared to patients who received PCT alone, but the addition of bRT to LRRT improved the OS and PFS compared to that of patients who received PCT + LRRT only with borderline significance (OS: HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.34–1.00, p = 0.051; PFS: HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.51–1.03, p = 0.068; Figure 2C,D ).

In Model 2, which additionally included metabolic parameters (HOMA-IR, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol), this association showed borderline significance (β = −0.121, p = 0.051).

In addition, the allele frequency of rs2248359 showed borderline significance ( p =0.051).

The answer choice “your employer or school” also had borderline significance between the ethnic groups such as white (M = 1.73, SD = 1.095, p = 0.051) and African Americans (M = 1.41, SD = 0.758), where the mean score of AA was mildly significantly lower than white.

Comparing both categorized variables (BATM-high and -low with EP3-high and -low), a correlation of only borderline significance could be found ( p = 0.051, Table 1 ).

With the exception of TG levels (borderline significance, p = 0.051), no other significant correlation was found between the percentage (%) of sdLDL on total LDL-C levels and other clinical or biochemical CVR factors ( Table 5 ). 4.

Although the presence of MvD showed a significant association with N95 amplitude (β = −0.815, p = 0.020), its association with P50 amplitude only showed a borderline significance (β = −0.428, p = 0.051).

ALB was also significantly elevated in Grassland Xichun horses (FDR-adjusted P = 0.016), whereas the difference in TP approached borderline significance after FDR correction (FDR-adjusted P = 0.051). 3.3 Breed comparison of hematological parameters The results of between-group comparisons for 18 hematological parameters are presented in Table 2 .

Most importantly, a significant association of methylated PCDH8 level to tumor maximal diameter at diagnosis (R s = 0.35; p = 0.028) as well as borderline significance to tumor volume (R s = 0.32; p = 0.051) at diagnosis was identified ( Figure 3 A,B).

By contrast, the between-stage difference in the MPP showed only borderline significance ( p = 0.051), and the magnitude of changes in the Gullstrand A/P and P/A ratios did not differ significantly between stages ( p = 0.203 and p = 0.208, respectively).

Borderline significance was found for anterior theta ( P =0.051).

The proportion of staff who had undertaken a specialist course was at borderline significance (50.5% in the control versus 36.1% in the intervention group, P = 0.051); although there was no difference in the proportion currently enrolled in an educational program or between experience as measured by time worked in current position or at the current site (Table 2 ).

The five oncologists had significant improvement for the difficult subset ( p = 0.009), but a borderline significance for the easy subset ( p = 0.051). 3.3.

Apixaban versus VKA had borderline significance ( P =0.051) for SSE, TIA, or death.