“borderline significance”

For the vertical reach, the ANOVA test revealed a borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

These survival differences were supported by unadjusted Cox regression analyses, which showed significantly higher hazard of graft failure among DCD recipients at 90 days (HR 2.50; 95% CI 1.23–5.16; p = 0.012) and borderline significance at 3 years (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.00–3.36; p = 0.05).

The family history of obesity showed borderline significance for steatosis (p = 0.05) but was not significant for MAFLD (Table 10 ).

While the diacerein group had reduced TNF-α levels at the 75th percentile with a borderline significance (P = 0.05), there were no changes in the IL levels at the 75 th percentile.

Subjects with blood transfusion history had a higher (20/40: 50%) seroprevalence of HEV exposure than those without such clinical characteristic (80/233: 34.3%) (borderline significance: P = 0.05).

Methylation of Wrap53α promoter was associated with worse overall survival of total patients with a borderline significance [adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.44, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.98–6.04, P=0.05].

A major limitation was the fact that the intervention was small, and there is a chance that the results were coincidental, given the borderline significance (p = 0.05).

In CMML, ASXL1 and TET2 mutations were associated with a trend toward better prognosis compared with wild-type (HR 0.21, p = 0.052; HR 0.25, p = 0.057, respectively), while U2AF1 mutations were associated with adverse prognosis in univariate analysis with borderline significance (HR 12.20, p = 0.050).

gondii seropositivity was higher in patients with reflex impairment (27.8%) than patients without this impairment (8.8%), and this difference showed a borderline significance ( P = 0.05).

Antibiotic exposure before prostate biopsy had borderline significance (p=0.05) ( Table 2 ).

However, the deceased WLWH tended to be younger, median age (IQR) 25 (21.8–33.8 ) versus 31 (27-34.3) years in their alive counterparts, but borderline significance, p = 0.05.

Pre-op LVEF was associated with the risk of post-op respiratory failure (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p = 0.01), whereas pre-op pulmonary hypertension showed borderline significance as a predictive factor (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.98–4.09, p = 0.05). - Wound dehiscence and delirium Our logistic regression analysis revealed obesity was not a risk factor for either wound dehiscence or delirium (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: [0.885–3.336], p = 0.11; OR: 1.03, 95% CI: [0.34–3.13], p = 0.95, respectively).

The proportion of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was higher in the RT group with borderline significance (P = 0.05).

Change in frequency of meals consumed with the family in front of the television was not a significant predictor of perceived increase in dietary healthfulness in males (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88–1.25, p = 0.601), and PSS score achieved only borderline significance in the male-only regression (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07, p = 0.05) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

However, this difference approached borderline significance ( P = 0.05) and did not translate into a significant difference in SDH thickness reduction (MD: −0.69, 95% CI: −3.31 to 1.93, P = 0.61) (Supplementary Fig. 2 ).

The overall risk of developing childhood asthma for a 10 μg/m 3 increase in prenatal PM 2.5 exposure was 1.12 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.26), with borderline significance ( P = 0.050) (Figure 2 ).

However, DCB + BMS had nonsignificantly lower LLL than BMS alone (in-segment LLL: MD, −0.14; 95% CI, −0.33–0.04; P = 0.24), and was more advantageous in reducing MACE incidence, with borderline significance (MACEs: RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45–0.99; P = 0.05).

Violin plots show LGALS3 expression (log2(counts+1)) in GSE126848 and GSE135251 datasets, (***p < 0.001, borderline significance p ≈ 0.05).

IVT was also associated with a reduced likelihood of good outcome (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.02), with a borderline significance value of p=0.05.

Group‐to‐group comparisons showed that there was no statistical difference between Groups 1 and 2 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 1.0; P = 0.3), a borderline significance between Groups 2 and 3 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 5.4; P = 0.05), and a significant difference between Groups 3 and 4 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 14.8; P = 0.008).

For DFS, both MCCUP status and non-sun-exposed tumor location showed a trend toward improved outcomes; however, these did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable model, consistent with the borderline significance observed in the univariate analysis ( p = 0.050 and p = 0.066, respectively).

The ICI group were less likely to receive chest radiotherapy than non-ICI group with borderline significance (44.4% vs 90.1%, p=0.05).

Variables with statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or borderline significance ( p = 0.05–0.10) in univariable analysis were included in the multivariate models.

However, assessing tumor weight and combining all of the EBV positive tumors with or without exogenous vector in comparison with the AGS tumors revealed a slightly enhanced growth of the EBV positive tumors with borderline significance (P = 0.05) ( Fig 1C ).

Any VTE was also associated with PC4d, but with borderline significance (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0, 4.4, P = 0.050), after adjustment for age, gender and LA.