Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Intriguingly, two genes ( NOTCH1 and NOS3 ) that previously had been associated with increased BAV risk in humans (Mohamed et al., 1797 ; Garg et al., 2005 ; McKellar et al., 2007 ; Foffa et al., 2013 ) and/or mice (Lee et al., 2000 ; Bosse et al., 2013 ) revealed borderline significance for protection from BAV/TAA ( p = 0.05 and p = 0.06, respectively).
borderline significanceP < .051.0× alpha
Stratified KM curves revealed that the risk score distinguished OS within the TNBC subgroup with borderline significance (log-rank test, P < .05), whereas no significant prognostic differentiation was observed in Luminal A/B or HER2-enriched subtypes (all P > .05, Supplemental Figure 1B ).
borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
Consistent with the previously published study ( Gursul et al., 2018 ), the gentle touch intervention resulted in a 39% reduction in the magnitude of the noxious-evoked brain activity, but a significant intervention effect was not observed (although the result indicated borderline significance) when baseline sensitivity was not accounted for, likely due to the lack of power with this sample size (linear regression, t = 1.95, p=0.05, Figure 3B , Study 2 indicates a power of 40% for a sample of this size without accounting for baseline sensitivity, Figure 2B ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Maximum serum albumin levels (as an inverse surrogate for post-operative inflammation) were higher in the robotic surgery group, albeit only reaching borderline significance, in the two studies ( n = 642 patients) that reported albumin post-operatively (MD 0.19, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.39], p = 0.05, I2 = 89%).