“borderline significance”

The small hyperuricemic subgroup and the borderline significance observed in men ( P -value = .05) require careful interpretation.

However, DCB + BMS had nonsignificantly lower LLL than BMS alone (in-segment LLL: MD, −0.14; 95% CI, −0.33–0.04; P = 0.24), and was more advantageous in reducing MACE incidence, with borderline significance (MACEs: RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45–0.99; P = 0.05).

A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.

In total, 27 (42.2%) patients in SSG and 155 (55.6%) patients in RRG reported at least 5 days of vitamin D-containing supplement consumption over one week during the past 6 months, respectively, and the difference reached the borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

EFS at 2 years showed borderline significance (RR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.38; p = 0.05) and 5 years follow-up (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.24; p = 0.04) were significantly higher in Busulfan–Fludarabine, though 1-year EFS was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.97–1.25; p = 0.15) (Table S3).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, SUVmax remained independently associated with grade 3 [odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.38, P<0.001], whereas 3D-CTR showed only borderline significance (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, P=0.050).

41 However, COX analysis showed that NLR was not an independent predictor of stent occlusion and only had borderline significance (p=0.050, HR=12.19, 95CI:1–147.85).

Group‐to‐group comparisons showed that there was no statistical difference between Groups 1 and 2 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 1.0; P = 0.3), a borderline significance between Groups 2 and 3 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 5.4; P = 0.05), and a significant difference between Groups 3 and 4 (log‐rank Mantel–Cox 14.8; P = 0.008).

Rubella seroprevalence was significantly (P = 0.02) higher in pregnant women with frequent headaches, whereas women with history of deliveries had a higher (borderline significance: P = 0.05) rubella seroprevalence than women without this history.

The apnea and hypopnea index (AHI) and percentage of time with oxyhemoglobin saturation <90% were not identified as predictors of reflux in the assessed patients, but they showed to be parameters with borderline significance ( p = 0.05) in the comparison between the groups of patients who showed positive RSI and RFS.

Four of the studies showed the pooled estimates of mean difference in the change of HAMA scores between acupuncture plus paroxetine or duloxetine group and medication alone group were statistically significant at week 4 (−1.94, 95%CI: −3.71 to −0.17; p = 0.03) with borderline significance at week 6/8 (−3.17, 95%CI: −6.38 to 0.04; p = 0.05) from baseline.

In Ph‐pos ALL, only borderline significance was seen in patients 46‐65 years ( P = 0.05, log‐rank; Figure 4 A and B).

Both CEA >5 ng/mL and CA19-9 >30 ng/mL had borderline significance (p = 0.05), and the number of harvested lymph nodes <12 was not a significant factor, but had a tendency of higher LRR (p = 0.098).

Among the lipid parameters, only low-density lipoproteins demonstrated borderline significance (p = 0.05) with CIMT.

Percentage predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ( D LCO ) was also relatively lower in the former with borderline significance (59.25±16.28 versus 66.08±13.67; p=0.05).

Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the downgrade rate was higher in the GBCA change group with borderline significance (adjusted OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.00–6.60; P = 0.05).

Consistent with the previously published study ( Gursul et al., 2018 ), the gentle touch intervention resulted in a 39% reduction in the magnitude of the noxious-evoked brain activity, but a significant intervention effect was not observed (although the result indicated borderline significance) when baseline sensitivity was not accounted for, likely due to the lack of power with this sample size (linear regression, t = 1.95, p=0.05, Figure 3B , Study 2 indicates a power of 40% for a sample of this size without accounting for baseline sensitivity, Figure 2B ).

In cohort 2, c-MYC GCN estimation in tissue by ddPCR was also significantly associated with results obtained by SISH (ρ = 0.349, P = 0.005), but correlated with plasma ddPCR with borderline significance (ρ = 0.246, P = 0.050).

Methylation of Wrap53α promoter was associated with worse overall survival of total patients with a borderline significance [adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.44, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.98–6.04, P=0.05].

Eosinophil count at 72 h showed borderline significance (0.13 [IQR 0.0 to 0.90] vs. 0.040 [0.0 to 0.76] K/μL, P = .05).

Change in frequency of meals consumed with the family in front of the television was not a significant predictor of perceived increase in dietary healthfulness in males (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88–1.25, p = 0.601), and PSS score achieved only borderline significance in the male-only regression (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07, p = 0.05) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

The difference in mortality rates reached the borderline significance level for isolated aortic (2.6% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.05) and mitral valve replacement (10.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.05) and was not significantly different for on-pump coronary surgery (11.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.32) and isolated tricuspid valve surgery (10.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.29) or aortic (2.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.35) and mitral (0.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.15) valve repairs; for complete data, see Table 3 . 4.

In particular, the borderline significance observed at the immediate post-operative interval ( p = 0.050) may have been influenced not only by the residual analgesic effect of the single-shot interscalene block (ISB), which typically provides pain relief for 12–24 h, but also by several additional factors.

Additionally, in the subset of patients with CVC, mechanical ventilation (OR 3.360, p = 0.008) and unknown source of candidemia (OR 4.270, p = 0.006) contributed to the model significantly, whereas the EQUAL score showed only borderline significance in the final model (OR 0.892, p = 0.050) ( Table 4 ).

However, the results showed borderline significance ( P = .05) for the Confidence dimension.