Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

GIP exhibited a negative trend with desire to eat and composite appetite with borderline significance ( ρ = −0.33 and −0.35, P = 0.08 and 0.05; Extended Data Fig. 5b ), whereas no significant associations were observed between satiety levels and GLP-1 or PYY ( P > 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Notably, the results of the test for differences between subgroups showed borderline significance ( p = 0.08) and there was an overlap of data between the Theoretical Paradigm group and the Multi-BCTs group, and between the NR group and the Fewer BCTs group, which implies that the number of BCTs may be a potential moderating variable contributing to differences in effect sizes ( Supplementary Figure S1 ). 3.5.4.
borderline significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
In multivariable analysis, risk factors for arterial thrombosis-free survival were age ≥60 years (HR 2.0; p < 0.001) and JAK2 mutation (HR 1.3; p = 0.02) with borderline significance for male gender ( p = 0.08) and cardiovascular risk factors ( p = 0.08); for venous thrombosis-free survival, JAK2 mutation (HR 1.9; p = 0.03) with borderline significance for venous thrombosis history ( p = 0.07); for overall survival, older age ( p < 0.001), male gender (HR 1.9; p < 0.001), absol
borderline significancep=0.08041.6× alpha
Interestingly, the potential antagonistic effect of tepoxalin and tariquidar identified in the two-dimensional drug assays was even more pronounced in the three-dimensional assays—the proportion of ABCB1 -expressing cells at the study end point was significantly more in the tepoxalin plus tariquidar condition than in tepoxalin treatment alone in the MCF7 and T47D lines (MCF7: p=0.0285, T47D: p<0.001), with borderline significance seen in the BT549 line (p=0.0804).
borderline significancep =0.0811.6× alpha
Although most diversity indices (Shannon, p =0.52; Simpson, p =0.4) showed no significant intergroup differences, the borderline significance of Richness ( p =0.081) and Chao1 ( p =0.081) indices suggested potential marginal differences in species richness between groups that did not reach conventional significance thresholds.