Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 5.9 × 10 –80.0× alpha
To the best of our knowledge, significant genome wide association for four of these loci are unreported in the context of de novo tinnitus (represented by rs7336872, rs115125870, rs1532898 and rs2537), with rs7336872 showing borderline significance in the study by Wells et al. 14 ( p = 5.9 × 10 –8 ).
borderline significanceP = 1.3E-070.0× alpha
Variants within LIPC (lipase hepatic, 15q21-q23) associated with HDLC-GLUC, ( rs2043085 , P = 1.3E-08) and with WC-HDLC ( rs10468017 , P = 5.5E-08); ABCB11 (ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B [MDR/TAP], member 11, 2q24) associated with HDLC-GLUC ( rs569805 , P = 8.5E-08); TRIB1 (tribbles homolog 1 [ Drosophila ], 8q24.13) variants were associated, respectively, with HDLC-TG ( rs2954026 , P = 7.9E-09) and TG-BP ( rs2954033 , P = 8.5E-09); and TFAP2B (transcription factor AP-2 β [activating enhancer binding protein 2 β], 6p12) was associated at a borderline significance level with WC-GLUC ( rs2206277 , P = 1.3E-07).
borderline significancep=2.0 × 10 −60.0× alpha
As noted in Table 3 , rs7130284 does not show compelling evidence for association with Hcy in the AA participants included in our meta-analysis (β= −0.069, p=0.023) but the rs11018628 variant reported in WGHS approached borderline significance (β= −0.14, p=2.0 × 10 −6 ).
borderline significancep = 7.69e−060.0× alpha
Moreover, Jmjd1a , a histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9)-specific demethylase that binds all 3 myocardin family members, was positively correlated with A velocity at week 3 with borderline significance ( r = 0.457, p = 7.69e−06, BH adjusted p = 0.0549) and is known to be upregulated in myocardium from patients with hypertrophic heart disease ( 21 ).
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significanceP = 0.0170.3× alpha
In a meta‐analysis of six studies of CRT, the 95% CIs for the improvement in peak VO 2 with CRT went from 0.32 to 3.22 mL/kg/min, with borderline significance, P = 0.017, 35 compared with the narrower CI, and more highly significant effect seen here: 95% CIs for the improvement in peak VO 2 with CCM between 0.56 and 1.30 mL/kg/min, P < 0.00001, giving a considerably more precise estimate of efficacy and of increased statistical significance.
borderline significance-Log 10 P -value=3.710.0× alpha
near-significant-Log 10 P -value=1.041.8× alphagold
In contrast, rs4304220 on chromosome 7 (6,243 SNPs) showed borderline significance: it was significant for RSB ( RSB =3.55, -Log 10 P -value=3.71) and near-significant for XP-EHH ( XP-EHH =1.33, -Log 10 P -value=1.04), also with positive values pointing to recent positive selection in the HC group ( Fig. 3 B).
borderline significanceP = 0.00020.0× alpha
After PSM, the incidence density of dementia (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.00–2.45; P = 0.0501) was higher with borderline significance in patients with AF than in patients with AFL, and the incidence density of ischemic stroke (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.56–4.12; P = 0.0002) was significantly higher in patients with AF than in patients with AFL (Supplemental Table 5).
borderline significanceP =0.00030.0× alpha
In the northern Finnish population, there was a SNP–SNP interaction that showed borderline significance for risk of moderate-to-severe BPD; this interaction was between IL6ST rs10471960 and IL10 rs3024493 SNPs ( P =0.0003, OR interaction =35.4; Table 4 ).
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significanceP = .040.8× alpha
Although amikacin and teicoplanin use were found to be highly significant in the univariable analysis ( P < .001), in the multivariable model, after adjusting for risk factors and other confounders, the association between amikacin and teicoplanin with the primary outcome attenuated showing only borderline significance ( P = .04 and P = .04, respectively).
borderline significanceP <0.0010.0× alpha
The DSS of RCC patients showed significance and borderline significance (-T3: P <0.001 and -T6: P =0.06, respectively) in the former (i) classification approach, but not in the latter (ii) P =0.3, indicating that there were complementary, but not competitive, correlations between GalNAc-T3 and -T6.