Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline non-significant”

435 sentences · 435 papers · 642 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
The correlation between the quadratic term CEB 2 and lifespan was large, negative and significant in three of four models (no covariates: r G = −1.09, P = 0.003, only mother identifier as random effect: r G = −1.73, P = 0.04, only education as random effect: r G = −0.85, P = 0.01), and borderline non-significant in the model with only the father identifier ( r G = −1.61, P = 0.06).
The association between sugar sweetened soda specifically and cancer rate was borderline non-significant (subdistribution hazard ratio for a 100 mL/d increase 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.23, P=0.06, total 101 257, incident cases 2193 for overall cancer; 1.10, 0.95 to 1.46, P=0.07, 79 724, 693 for breast cancer, data not tabulated), but the consumption was limited (median consumption=5.8 mL/d).
borderline non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
The meta-analysis of the in vivo studies indicated that calcium-hydroxide powder/saline promotes reparative bridge formation better than the popular commercial resin-free calcium-silicate cement Pro-Root MTA (Dentsply-Sirona), although the difference was borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06), and better than calcium-hydroxide cements ( p < 0.0001).
borderline non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
The model with time and the interaction intervention*time showed a borderline non-significant relationship between VR+ on the achievement of work participation on discharge: OR 1.8 (CI 1.0–3.4), p = 0.06, and a significant relationship on 6-months follow-up: OR = 1.8 (CI 1.1–2.8), p = 0.01.
borderline non-significantP = 0.0601.2× alpha
For overall IBD, the continuous LC9 score was significantly associated with reduced IBD risk in Models 1 and 2 (Model 1: HR 0.956, 95% CI 0.934–0.979, P < 0.001; Model 2: HR 0.960, 95% CI 0.937–0.983, P = 0.001), while the association in Model 3 was attenuated and borderline non-significant (HR 0.976, 95% CI 0.953–1.001, P = 0.060).