“borderline non-significant”

In the current study, FGFR1 and MET amplifications were restricted to the EGFRwt/KRASwt tumor group, and were mutually exclusive ( MET amplification was borderline non-significant for difference in frequency between mutation groups, p=0.09, Fisher’s exact test).

Rana sylvatica appeared to be calling earlier by an average of 0.48 days per year, or 19.2 days over four decades; however, the trend was borderline non-significant ( F 1 , 20 = 3.157, R 2 = 0.136, P = 0.091).

Interestingly, we observed a borderline non-significant negative correlation between 24-h urinary 52 Cr-EDTA/creatinine excretion and relative numbers of F . prausnitzii ( ρ = -0.221, P = 0.092, Fig 3A ).

The GDP per capita showed a borderline non-significant association in the multiple regression model (GDP per capita: p = 0.097).

However, CellViT and Abousamra models showed borderline non-significant results with a HR = 0.94 (95% CI = [0.88–1.01], p = 0.097) and HR = 0.98 (95% CI = [0.97–1.00], p = 0.122) respectively.

Excess soft tissue showed a borderline non-significant association with mechanism of injury ( p = 0.098).

HLA-II associations for antigens from the IEDB compared to the whole set of antibody-bound peptides were borderline non-significant (Fig. 2 d, [ p ~ 0.1]).

1.00 m/s, p = 0.036), and handgrip strength showed a borderline non-significant trend toward lower values ( p = 0.100).

For sex, we noted borderline non-significant trends where male patients had higher percentages of CD68+ cells in primary ( p = 0.11) and longitudinal ( p = 0.07) samples (Additional File 2: Figure S4 ).

Results in the fixed effect model show a weak inverse borderline non-significant correlation between a higher intake of dietary fiber and the risk of pancreatic cancer (Y = −0.79, z = −0.02, p = 0.175).

A non-significant treatment × species interaction was present (F(21, 40.674) = 1.037, p = 0.446), and the species effect remained borderline non-significant (F(3, 40.625) = 2.664, p = 0.446).

The combination of any three or more biomarkers categorized as high also showed a significant difference in PFS ( p = 0.034) and borderline non-significant separation in OS ( p = 0.65) ( Figure 4A , middle-left).

The RG and FG demonstrated significant differences in gender proportion, number of diseases, percent body fat as well as maximum leg strength (MIES, MIFS), while skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, 30-STS, 5-STS were borderline non-significant ( Table 2 ). 3.1 Feasibility The YG and RG demonstrated higher recruitment (66.7 and 64.6%), adherence (92.0 and 97.3%), and retention rates (90.0 and 90.9%) and lower dropout rates (10.0 and 9.1%) than the FG in the assisted living facility, in which the recruitment rate (46.2%) was lower.

Three studies 1 , 22 , 24 reported sICH, with a borderline non-significant higher risk among patients with no-reflow (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.00–3.56; I 2 = 0.0%; Figure 5(b) ).

In the head-to-head analysis, which included nine study arms from publications comparing more than one pacing technique, the adjusted overall effect was SMD = −0.10 (95%CI: −0.20 to +0.01; p = 0.063), which was borderline non-significant.

Analysis of the results by sex revealed that for men, there were no significant differences in intakes of total fat, mono- and polyunsaturated fats, omega 3 fatty acids, sugar, and alcohol, in addition to borderline non-significant differences for carbohydrates and saturated fats ( Appendix Table A ).

The borderline non-significant intercept term and slope coefficient for UKPDS 82 indicated a slight improvement in fit compared to UKPDS 68.

Notably, we found borderline non-significant group differences in child motor outcomes at age 2 years ( Table 4 ).

Additionally, the association was borderline non-significant and the effect sizes were not dramatically altered from the main analysis, suggesting a loss of power may be responsible for these results.

In particular, we observed a borderline non-significant association only for ICU and vitamin level <25 and 75 nmol/L.

Furthermore, every functioning scale was statistically significantly inversely related to all-cause mortality, except for cognitive functioning which was borderline non-significant (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88–1.02), with physical functioning displaying the strongest association (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75–0.86; Table 4 ).

However, heterogeneity was significant in the meta-analysis for two variants, and borderline non-significant for a third.

The protein ubiquitination pathway showed borderline non-significant enrichment for the CF phenotype, and the antigen presentation pathway, although showing some enrichment for the down-regulated end of our data set, was also not significant.

This limited precision also applies to borderline non-significant findings, including the unadjusted rest-pain AUC comparison, for which a type II error cannot be excluded.

Modest, sex-specific differences between groups included the trend towards a higher mean 24h ACTH in female offspring, and in males a significantly higher basal ACTH secretion in offspring and a borderline non-significant lower recovery EC 50 in the endogenous ACTH-cortisol dose-response relationship.