Barely Significant
← all phrases

“barely significant”

876 sentences · 876 papers · 1,127 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

barely significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Similarly, in another cross-sectional nationwide study using zero-inflated negative binomial models to estimate the association between long-term (2010–2016) county-level exposures to NO 2 , PM 2.5 , and ozone and COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates, PM 2.5 was significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality rates when a single pollutant model was used but was barely significant (MRR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00–1.32; p = 0.051) in a tri-pollutant model, whereas NO 2 levels remained positively associated with both COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates [ 75 ].
Environmental Determinants of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep · 2021 · PMC7934813
barely significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
On the other hand, it was observed a lower likelihood of having excess weight (barely significant) and obesity in mostly unfree countries (excess weight: OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.51–1.00, P = 0.052), (obesity: OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.39–0.92, P = 0.019) compared to free/mostly free countries.
barely significantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
A subsequent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sifalimumab was barely significant ( P = 0.053; though the a priori cutoff for this trial was unconventionally P = 0.1), and there was no clear dosage effect (Khamashta et al. 2016 ).
Lupus pathobiology based on genomics.
Immunogenetics · 2017 · PMC5203839
barely significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Univariate effects for group differences were significant for PD ( M = 4.93, SE = 2.16; F (1, 31) = 5.23, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.145), SI ( M = 4.92, SE = 0.386; F (1, 31) = 5.69, p = 0.023, η p 2 = 0.155), and DS ( M = 1.16, SE = 0.383; F (1, 31) = 9.23, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.229), while barely significant for P–CDI ( M = 3.82, SE = 1.92; F (1, 31) = 3.94, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.113) and not significant for DC ( M = 0.173, SE = 2.63; F (1, 31) = 0.004, p = 0. 948, η p 2 < 0.001).
barely significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Divergence times Tests of the hypothesis of a strict, global molecular clock using likelihood ratio tests (Additional file 1 , Table S5) either rejected the clock at p < 0.05 but at barely significant p-values (PAUP clock analyses, p-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.049), or failed to reject the clock (PAML based ML analysis, p = 0.057).