Barely Significant
← all phrases

“barely significant”

876 sentences · 876 papers · 1,127 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

barely significantP < 0.081.6× alphagold
Finally, a recent meta-analysis [ 11 ] shows a barely significant decrease in mortality using early initiation of RRT in prospective studies (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.05; P < 0.08) and a significant decrease in mortality using early initiation of RRT in observational studies (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.82; P < 0.001).
barely significantp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
SDO and Attitudes toward Women as Managers: The Moderating Role of Superiors’ Gender Results revealed (a) a significant and positive association of SDO (b = 0.25, SE = 0.05, t = 4.84, p < 0.001, (95%CI = 0.15; 0.35)) and (b) a barely significant association of superiors’ gender (b = −0.19, SE = 0.11, t = −1.74, p = 0.083, (95%CI = −0.40; 0.02)) with attitudes towards women managers.
barely significantp = 0.102.0× alphagold
Sharing Flex is barely significant for this class (p = 0.10), with respondents willing to pay only as much as €0.53 more for a private ride, again highlighting their high cost sensitivity. ‘ Flex-ready individuals ’ are the strongest supporters of dial-a-ride-style services, as they do not seem to be too bothered by sitting close to strangers or having to pre-book a ride.
Potential of on-demand services for urban travel.
Transportation (Amst) · 2022 · PMC8969820
barely significantp = 0.64913.0× alphagold
This association was not significant or only barely significant when HOXA7 (Figure 4D ; p = 0.649), HOXA10 (Figure 4F ; p = 0.122), HOXC4 (Figure 4H ; p = 0.048) or HOXC6 (Figure 4J ; p = 0.166) were themselves also overexpressed.
CD133 in brain tumor: the prognostic factor.
Oncotarget · 2017 · PMC5355253
In contrast, the generalization to the unseen correct/incorrect trials was barely significant, did not reveal any clear pattern, and the time course of diagonal decoding was highly dissimilar from the one observed above ( Figure 4 —figure supplement 2A , right): It first sharply peaked at ~180 ms (AUC = 0.55 +/- 0.01, p uncorrected =0.037), dropped to chance-level, and then exceeded chance between ~372 and 724 ms with a peak at 444 ms (AUC = 0.57 +/- 0.02, p uncorrected =0.007).