Barely Significant
← all phrases

“barely not statistically significant”

14 sentences · 14 papers · 32 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

barely not statistically significantp = 0.05591.1× alphagold
Similarly, a significant main effect of the rearing condition on the expression of Bdnf long 3’-UTR mRNA levels was found (F(3, 52) = 6.750, p = 0.00067, see Fig 5B ), with a significant decrease in the expression of Bdnf long 3’-UTR within the prefrontal cortex of animals isolated only during adolescence or adulthood (post-hoc: p<0.05 for ELSI and p<0.001 for AdSI), whereas this reduction was barely not statistically significant in lifelong isolated animals (post-hoc: p = 0.0559).
barely not statistically significantp = 0.06131.2× alphagold
Although the positive control (MCl - 1 distal, unmutated) showed an increase in luciferase expression that was just barely not statistically significant by our threshold (p = 0.0613), we argue that these experiments still collectively demonstrate that the Tead-Yap1 interaction is essential for the regulation of these cis- regulatory elements. 8) Figure 2 is not well organized.
We observed similar results in our replication experiments but they were just barely not statistically significant at the α = 0.05 level, most likely due to a cage having to be sacrificed due to poor health ( Fig. 3 B; repeated measures ANOVA, reward rate: (1 d) n = 5 mice, (28 d) n = 6 mice, F (1,9) = 5.23, P = 0.05).
We found that Omega-3 EE was associated with a 14% (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.94) significant risk reduction of death from cardiac cause and with barely not statistically significant risk reduction of all cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83–1.03) ( Figure 1 ), confirming findings reported by Leon et al. 38 Of note, the beneficial effects on risk of CV disease (CVD) appeared strong in the analysis of trials of secondary prevention, but not in those of the primary one. 39 This finding should be considered against the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in primary CVD prevention.
Standard+MAR came in 2nd with a statistically significant positive association (K 1.000, p 0.046) by Observer 3, Emax using the Standard setting produced statistically significant positive association (K 1.000, p 0.083) by Observer 3, the 3Y using the Standard settings was the 2nd lowest of all settings with a barely not statistically significant results with a negative association (K -0.800, p 0.083) by observer 3, and finally 5Y using the Standard setting was the lowest of all with a statistically significant negative association (K -0.471, p 0.025; K -0.800, p 0.083; K -1.000, p 0.157 respectively) by Observers 1, 2 and 3 (Tables 4-7, Fig. 1).