Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approaching significance”

2,641 sentences · 2,641 papers · 3,385 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significancep = 0.0701.4× alphagold
These revealed a significant linear trend in threat detection accuracy ( R 2 = 0.04, constant = 74, b = 0.74, p = 0.003; see also Table 2 ) and linear trends in HFA and d’ approaching significance (HFA: R 2 = 0.02, constant = 49, b = 0.81, p = 0.070; d’: R 2 = 0.02, constant = 1.37, b = 0.03, p = 0.058).
approaching significancep = .071.4× alphagold
2 ) revealed significant positive associations (based on an adjusted p -value divided by three for each correlation computed in the three diagnostic groups: 0.05/3 = 0.017) in the SCD group ( r (24) = 0.64, p < .001, R 2 = 0.41) and the MCI group ( r (63) = 0.70, p < .001, R 2 = 0.49), and associations approaching significance in the AD group ( r (14) = 0.43, p = .07, R 2 = 0.18), suggesting that the more pure-tone hearing loss the participants exhibited, the greater (worse) their SRTs were on the CDTT.
approaching significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The relative gene expression level of ACAN was significantly higher in HYP than NRX of P2 (3.31-fold, p = 0.018) and P4 (3.07-fold, p = 0.01) while HYP stimulated a higher relative gene expression level of COL2A1 in P1 (4.03-fold, approaching significance: p = 0.07), P2 (6.17-fold, p = 0.029) and P4 (8.91 fold: p = 0.085).
approaching significanceP =0.071.4× alphagold
To independently confirm this, we performed a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the TDA-identified subject subsets, confirming significant drug effects on MN sparing ( P =0.02) and tissue area at the epicentre ( P =0.002), with other outcomes approaching significance, including grooming at 28 days post lesion (DPL) ( P =0.07).
approaching significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
On the one hand, Ross and colleagues [ 20 ] evaluated maximal aerobic capacity using the Yo-Yo IET test, in which they observed a significant increase ( p < 0.05) in pre-exercise heart rate and a lower total distance covered, with results approaching significance ( p = 0.07), during the mid-luteal phase compared to the early follicular phase.