No difference was observed in Aβ42 or Aβ40 levels between groups, although the difference in Aβ42 levels between low and high overall burden of PVS was approaching significance (F(1,53) = 3.65 p = 0.064, η2 = .06).
← all phrases
“approaching significance”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Pain scores were significantly improved at the 4-, 12-, 16-, 20-, and 24-hour time points (p < 0.001, p = 0.010, p = 0.002, p = 0.006, and p = 0.009), with the 8-hour time point approaching significance (p = 0.064) in the liposomal bupivacaine group versus the bupivacaine group.
Group 4 (IVs adjusted): The IVW method showed a negative association approaching significance ( θ = −0.385, standard error = 0.208, P = .064, OR = 0.680, 95% CI: 0.453–1.023, Fig. 2 ).
Within the 0.5 km buffer, the association between area-level SES and waist circumference remained significant across all tertiles of greenery, except for the lower greenery tertile of mean NDVI, which had a p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.064).
Additional predictors of strength of urge Categorical variables (alcohol consumption, gender, employment, meeting PA guidelines, presence of a mental health condition), and continuous variables (EQ-5D-3L, MPSS, FTCD, mCEQ reward), significantly correlated with SOU, or approaching significance (PSS ([ p = 0.064]; for the correlations see Online Resource 2 ) were included in series of linear regression models investigating the effects of each potential predictor individually on SOU.
LH (r=0.308) showed a moderate positive correlation, with a p-value approaching significance (P=0.064), while serum insulin (r=0.331) exhibited a very weak positive correlation, also nearing statistical significance (P=0.084).
Compared with the G2 group, the G3 group had no statistical difference ( P = 0.092), but the G4 group had an approaching significance ( P = 0.064).
tb than those vaccinated with WT BCG-Pasteur and the difference was approaching significance ( p = 0.064, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 5C ).
Post-hoc t-tests to assess this showed no significant effect of time for any of the groups, but an effect approaching significance was seen for the tDCS group (t = 2.115, d.f. = 9, p = 0.064), with a lower invalid-valid cue RT difference following tDCS (58.7 ms before, 44.2 ms after tDCS), whereas other groups showed an increase.
The ANOVA on these retention scores revealed that there was a significant main effect of age, F (1, 30) = 7.362, p = 0.011, η 2 = 0.11; a main effect of condition only approaching significance, F (1, 30) = 3.697, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.05, suggesting marginally higher identification scores in the without book condition; and no significant main effect of session, F (1, 30) = 0.013, p = 0.909, η 2 < 0.001.
We observed a main effect of sex in resting blood flow and conductance, with an interaction between sex and condition on blood flow, and approaching significance in conductance ( p = 0.064).
At the group level, baseline-normalized corticospinal excitability was facilitated, both during action observation and the startle response, approaching significance in both cases (z = 0.25, p = 0.0645; z = 0.48, p = 0.0645, respectively).
The DTA X Self-Esteem interaction was approaching significance, β = −0.06, t (228) = 1.86, p = 0.065, 95% CI [−0.12, 0.00].
More babies developed ROP in zone II ( P = 0.033), and more babies developed stage II ( P = 0.065, which is approaching significance) in the multiple ART group compared to the multiple natural group, but no difference was found in the frequency of ROP development nor the need for treatment ( P = 0.391, P = 0.633, respectively).
Our results showed that TES significantly improved measures of gait (SMD = 0.844, CI [0.166 to 1.521], p = 0.015), however had no effect on hand movements although this was approaching significance (SMD = 0.945, CI [−0.058 to 1.948], p = 0.065).
Node-splitting confirmed that direct and indirect evidence disagreed significantly for three comparisons: DSI versus UC ( p = 0.015), PS versus UC ( p = 0.027), and the internal DrugChoice loop ( p = 0.047), with DSI versus NS approaching significance ( p = 0.065; Supplementary Figure S3 ).
Mean concentrations of EDTA and serum for p‐tau181 decreased over freeze–thaw cycles but reached statistical difference at freeze–thaw cycle 4 for plasma ( P < .01) but not serum; however, serum p‐tau181 freeze–thaw cycle 4 was approaching significance ( P = .065, Figure 5H ). 4.
A 2 × 2 analysis of variance (ANOVA) of ACE scores with two between-subjects factors of BDNF (Val/Val, Met) and 5-HTTLPR serotonin transporter gene (L,S) revealed a significant main effect for 5-HTTLPR, F (1, 96) = 5.61, p = .02, Partial Eta Squared = 0.055, with the BDNF x 5-HTTLPR interaction approaching significance, F (1, 96) = 3.49, p = .065, Partial Eta Squared = 0.035.
The three‐way interaction was approaching significance in predicting arousal symptoms, B = 0.03, p = .065, but not statistically significant, contrary to hypotheses.
A block-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 3.23, p = .006] and a block-cue-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 2.58, p = .022] also emerged, with a main effect of group approaching significance [ F(2,40) = 2.59, p = .065].
In females, a time × group interaction approaching significance ( F (1,41) = 3.59, p = 0.065) indicated that sucrose preference was decreased in CMS females after BT/CMS re-exposure ( p = 0.025 compared to baseline), whereas no change over time was observed in CTRL females.
The relative expression of CD8A was significantly increased in large AAA but not small AAA biopsies compared to normal controls (Table 6 ), with the median relative expression of CD8A in large AAA ~2-fold higher and approaching significance compared to small AAA (109.489 vs 61.004; P = 0.065).
Interestingly, retirement led to an increased circulating level of total CHOL (+8.3%), despite the decrease in HDL level and the increase in LDL after retirement showed an approaching significance (HDL: −3.5%, p = 0.065; LDL: +9.3%, p = 0.065) in these former elite collegiate TKD athletes.
Radiotherapy interruptions were more common in the JKN‐NON‐PBI group (81.5%) than the JKN‐PBI group (69.0%), with the difference approaching significance ( p = 0.065; Table 2 ).
Diagnosis Despite approaching significance (χ 2 = 11.85, df = 6, p = 0.0654), there was no association between the reason for admission and the diagnosis.