“approached significance”

Preliminary analyses revealed that the difference in SBP baseline values between the later Stroop Prime conditions approached significance, t (82) = 1.91, p = .06, η 2 = .04.

Similarly, for sensitivity, the test approached significance but did not reach conventional levels (z = −1.88, p = 0.060), though a warning regarding variance stability was noted.

Siahpush et al [ 6 ] found a positive relationship between promotions and cravings to smoke that approached significance ( P =.06).

Opioid use approached significance ( P = 0.06), with three fewer patients prescribed opioids in the dexamethasone group; however, no medication had any significant impact on pain relief on further paired analysis.

A significant interaction was observed between reading direction and lighting direction, F (3, 261) = 20.57, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.191, while the interaction between reading direction and target location approached significance, F (3, 261) = 2.49, p = 0.06, = 0.028.

Between-treatment difference in %∆ peak velocity approached significance ( p = 0.06).

The Pearson correlations approached significance for the young insulin sensitive and resistant groups (r = 0.12, p < 0.060).

The impact of sex on the effect of cue exposure on food intake approached significance ( p = .06), with food intake significantly decreasing after exposure to weight control cues with a small effect size in females.

In the mixed-effects multivariable model for US adherence, none of the aforementioned sociodemographic or treatment covariates had a statistically significant association with likelihood of US adherence, although the receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy approached significance, with an odds ratio [OR] of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.02; p = 0.06).

There were no significant effects of HUCAPS exposure or interaction between genotype and exposure on the slope in the performance phase. A genotype effect, comparing 3xTgAD and NTg mice mean performance phase errors, approached significance (β = 0.138, SE = 0.071, p = 0.060) (Fig. 5 b).

Regarding the control group, the association between PI and L5 TPA approached significance ( P = .06).

Neither patients nor controls showed an effect of episodic strength in the unrelated condition [although the contrast approached significance for controls: t(12) = 2.48, p = .060; patients: t < 1, Bonferroni corrected for two comparisons].

The Lagrange multiplier test approached significance [χ 2 (49) = 65.83, p = 0.06], but the univariate chi-square test for the variance and covariance of factor 3 was significant (chi-square of 15.05, df of 1, and p < 0.001).

In comparisons of the prevalence of the conditions by age in NHANES and NHIS, we found no statistical differences between prevalence by age group ( online supplemental table 1 ), although the difference in hypertension among 40–49 years old was 6% higher in NHIS, which approached significance (p=0.06).

Interestingly, a paired t-test on the number of targets acquired in the last block on the first visit and in the first block on the second visit approached significance (t(17) = −2, p = 0.06).

In HS+ve, the ratio of epileptogenic cerebrum to whole brain volume was less (p = 0.02); the ratio of epileptogenic cerebral cortex to whole brain in the HS+ve group approached significance (p = 0.06).

These results were statistically significant for the TUG ( p = 0.002) and KOOS-Pain ( p = 0.005) scores and approached significance for the SCT ( p = 0.060), KOOS-ADL ( p = 0.057), and KOOS-QOL ( p = 0.065) scores.

MoCa scores correlation with R2* 0 in the posterior cingulate and CBF 0 in the precuneus approached significance ( r = 0.34, P = 0.06; r = 0.32, P = 0.07 respectively). 4.

The two sub-ROIs at and immediately inside the boundary approached significance ( p ’s < 0.08; smallest p = 0.06).

One result approached significance ( p = 0.06) with decreased DTPA absorption rates associated with benzamil.

NVP-BEZ235- and control-treated mice had similar numbers of lesions; significantly fewer metastases were evident in dovitinib-treated mice, while for the combination treatment the P -value approached significance ( n = 5, P < 0.06) (Figure 2C ).

The direct effect approached significance, − 0.196, 95% CI [–0.012, − 0.360], p = .060, while the total effect was significant, = − 0.411, 95% CI [–0.300, − 0.540], p < .001.

In adjusted models, this effect approached significance (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.09–1.08; p = 0.06) and appeared stronger in controls than in overweight or obesity.

The Mood x Delay interaction approached significance, F(1,124) = 3.592, p = .06, partial η2 = .028 (see Table 3 ).

Neuroticism approached significance ( p = 0.06), indicating that more power may reveal a significant difference between adults and adolescents.