Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep = 0.0601.2× alpha
There were no significant effects of HUCAPS exposure or interaction between genotype and exposure on the slope in the performance phase. A genotype effect, comparing 3xTgAD and NTg mice mean performance phase errors, approached significance (β = 0.138, SE = 0.071, p = 0.060) (Fig. 5 b).
approached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The main effect of site was significant in its association with education ( F (22,298) = 1.98, p = 0.01, η 2 p = 0.18), birth decade approached significance in its association with education ( F (6298) = 2.06, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.04), and there was a group by birth decade interaction ( b = 2.98, SEM = 1.51, t (298) = 1.98, p = 0.049); however, upon inspection, there was no consistent pattern of interest.
approached significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
Preliminary investigation showed, within novel grade 2 and 3 tumors, that correlation of recurrence with length of extraosseous tumor extension approached significance ( P = 0.06), although measurements of tumor size (longest axial diameter and product of longest two axial dimensions) did not ( P = 0.13 and 0.37, respectively).
approached significancep=.061.2× alpha
Stratified analyses on the presence or absence of reported maternal prenatal daily life stress, suggested that higher T2 IL-6 in particular, and IL-8 were driving the significant interactions that predicted higher depressive symptoms in adolescent offspring only when prenatal maternal stress had been present (the latter only approached significance in stratified analyses, p=.06).
approached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Moreover, myofibrillar protein content of CP was significantly greater than WP, and approached significance relative to PLA (p = 0.06). 3.5 Signaling proteins that regulate the activation of SC Expression of proteins involved in the activation of satellite cells was then investigated using Western blot.
approached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
The difference in accuracy between corresponding and noncorresponding trials seemed smaller in patients on medication compared to when they were off medication (Acc, Medication × Correspondence, F (1, 23) = 6.56, p < 0.05, ƞ 2 = 0.22 ) which approached significance in a paired sampled t test comparing the difference between corresponding and noncorresponding trials on and off medication ( t (24) = 1.96, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.33 ) .