Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep < .0220.4× alpha
Therapy effect differences in SWLS scores (between analyses with baseline as covariate) The fixed effect of Group ( F 1,137 = 2.50, p = .117) and of Group * Time ( F 3,276 = 1.03, p = .380) was not significant, whereas the effect of Time approached significance ( F 3,276 = 1.03, p < .022).
approached significancep = 0.02380.5× alpha
A significant decrease in RBD + B cells was observed when BTKi grouped patients (median = 0.12 per 10 6 lymphocytes) and treatment naïve (median = 41.8 per 10 6 lymphocytes) patients, that approached significance ( p = 0.0238) (Fig. 4 B).
approached significanceP = 0.0240.5× alpha
Primary outcomes There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control conditions on the primary outcomes at 6-month follow-up, although the effect of the intervention on fruit and vegetable intake approached significance: fruit and vegetable intake ( P = 0.024), physical activity ( P = 0.932), smoking status ( p = 0.293), and alcohol consumption ( P = 0.277).
approached significancep = 0.0260.5× alpha
3.2.3 Motor function, grip strength, and daily living performance For the FMA-UE scores, a mixed-design ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time [ F ( 1.385 , 69.256 ) = 33.33 , p < 0.001 ] and a time × group interaction that approached significance after FDR correction [ F ( 1.385 , 69.256 ) = 4.73 , p = 0.026 , FDR-corrected p = 0.052 ].
approached significancep = 0.0260.5× alpha
Correlations with total T levels that approached significance were: overview item QII – impact on QoL (r = 0.21, p = 0.026), and domain bodily pain (rho = 0.27, p = 0.009) (indicating a tendency for greater perceived impact of hormonal decline on QoL, and greater perceived impact on bodily pain with decreasing T levels).
approached significancep =.0270.5× alpha
A follow-up ANOVA with internalizing behaviors as the dependent variable revealed a main effect of time that approached significance ( F (1, 60) = 5.14, p =.027, η p 2 = .08); there was no significant main effect of group, nor a group by time interaction ( p s > .05).