Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep = 0.0080.2× alpha
With regard to unique predictors of change in outcomes, similarity of offender spirituality was the most consistent predictor showing significant, negative associations with growth in unforgiveness, emotional expressivity, and self-esteem (βs = −0.17 to −0.42, p s ≤ 0.005) and significant, positive associations with empathy (β = 0.40, p = 0.002), and positive affect (β = 0.46, p < 0.001) and a positive association that approached significance for emotional forgiveness (β = 0.32, p = 0.008).
approached significancep = .0080.2× alpha
In the full model, there were no significant interactions between either sex or FSM and any of the predictor variables at the p < .005 level, although the interaction between sex and active prototype similarity approached significance (β = −0.11, 95% CI −0.19 to −0.03, p = .008): the positive relationship between change in prototype perception and change in physical activity was stronger for boys than girls.
approached significancep = 0.0100.2× alpha
lso significant three-way interactions between trial type, group, and PTSS ( F (2, 88) = 3.46, p = .036, partial η 2 = 0.073) and between trial type, PTSS and gender ( F (1, 88) = 4.45, p = .037, partial η 2 = 0.049); no other between-subjects effects of group, gender, or PTSS, and no interactions, approached significance (all p ’s > .100) except the interaction between trial type and the covariate age ( F (1, 88) = 6.84, p = 0.010).
approached significanceP < 0.010.2× alpha
The volume of the activated area increased after CIMT: The volume of the activated area in the contralateral sensorimotor area (lesion side) was 425.31 ± 264.09 mm 3 and 669.77 ± 492.08 mm 3 before and after CIMT, respectively, which approached significance ( P < 0.01).
approached significanceP = .0100.2× alpha
CKD risk approached significance (moderate/high vs low: HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07, P = .010; P -interaction = .071), while MeTS absence was unexpectedly associated with increased risk (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.07, P = .041) despite non-significant interaction ( P -interaction = .449).
highly significantp<.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
approached significancep = .061.2× alpha
Both groups showed a positive relationship between these variables in each test session: this relationship approached significance in the first test session, r = .52 for Caf-PAL rats and r = .56 for Chow-CHOW rats, larger t (10) = 2.12, p = .06, and was highly significant in the final test session, r = .74 for Caf-PAL rats and r = .71 for Chow-CHOW rats, smaller t (10) = 3.21, p<.01.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
approached significancep = 0.0581.2× alpha
Among them, microwave temperature and ultrasonic power exhibited highly significant effects ( p < 0.01), water content showed significant influence ( p < 0.05), while ultrasonic time approached significance ( p = 0.058).