approached significancep = 0.051
Further, the tendency for men to appraise their voice experience as more benevolent than women approached significance [ t (111.89) = 1.96, p = 0.051].
Further, the tendency for men to appraise their voice experience as more benevolent than women approached significance [ t (111.89) = 1.96, p = 0.051].
Improvement on the pain subscale with an increase of 10.7 points from baseline to 12th cycle, approached significance ( p = 0.051, n = 21).
There was an incremental seroprevalence with age that approached significance ( P = 0.051).
However, the cumulative drop in the controls’ retention over the 30-min to 8-hr interval approached significance, t (15) = 2.121, p = .051, r = .48.
Moreover, the results from Process Model 1 [ 61 ] revealed a two-way interaction between poor sleep and initial event affect that approached significance; B = −0.432 ( SE = 0.221), t (1024) = −1.956, p < 0.051, 95% CI [−0.865, 0.001], Model Δ R 2 (due to the two-way interaction) < 0.003, overall Model R 2 = 0.320, p < 0.001.
The association between the XRCC1 Gln allelic variants and reduced OS in stage II/III patients approached significance (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.00–1.99, P = 0.051, FDR = 0.510).
The association between depression and lower HL was significant for most HL domains (HLQ1–HLQ8) and approached significance for ‘understand health information well enough to know what to do’ (HLQ9) domain (OR 2.26, p=0.051).
The reduction in ED visits with sugammadex was significant in the younger age group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.95; p = 0.017), but only approached significance in the older age group (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–1.00; p = 0.051).
However, the p value approached significance ( p = 0.051, Pearson correlation = −0.215), as the correlation coefficient test was significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed p value).
A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed that the revaluation group × distractor-type interaction approached significance, F (1,55) = 3.97, p = .051, η p 2 = .07 [0, .19], with a trend towards a greater difference in capture by high-training versus low-training distractors in the NoRev group than the Rev group ( Figure 6d ).
Ischemic heart disease approached significance, with a lower prevalence in EPM (26.9% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.051).
( 18 ) evaluated CR in rhesus monkeys and reported only that the content of IRS-1 approached significance ( P = 0.051).
The highest foreign language score ( β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and whether they had participated in intercultural training ( β = 0.110, p = 0.008) remained significant, while the influence of education status approached significance ( β = 0.085, p = 0.051).
The MR-PRESSO global test showed no significant evidence of distortion due to pleiotropy for most outcomes, although telomere length approached significance ( P = 0.051).
For all subjects, a main effect of training status approached significance (F( 1 , 21 ) = 4.2786, P=0.051) as strength trained participants (118.8 ± 27.3 ft-lbs) tended to have greater force output than untrained participants (UT, 98.8 ± 26.0 ft-lbs).
Several comparisons approached significance, including verbal cueing versus physical cueing ( p = 0.051), physical cueing versus full cueing ( p = 0.063), and no cueing versus verbal cueing ( p = 0.069). 3.3.4.
The increase in the detectability of fibrillin-2 fragments in those with TAD compared with the TAA group also approached significance ( P = .051; Table V ).
This relationship also approached significance 121–150 days after surgery ( p =0.051).
The pairwise differences between the Northwestern and Southern regions approached significance (OR = 0.0198 ± 0.0328, P = 0.051).
Improvement in QoL approached significance at 12 weeks (P = .051).
The influence ‘with alcohol’ approached significance at p=0.051.
The only measure that approached significance was the WAB-R (p = .051) with a medium effect size (partial eta squared = .12).
Interestingly, the difference for the “Alcohol-Sleep” cluster approached significance after adjustment (Estimate = −0.265, p = 0.051).
The differential effect of stress on learned responses for valuable versus devalued outcomes approached significance (value × MAST: F (1,89) = 3.91, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.042).
While none of the interactions reached significance, the task × route part interaction approached significance, F (1, 105) = 3.89, p = .051, η p 2 = .036.