Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

Time × Group interactions were non-significant or only marginally approached significance, suggesting comparable improvement across groups, although contrast analyses revealed some differences in SCL reduction over time between groups (see Contrast analysis section).
There was no difference in change over time between the 2 groups, and there was no significant difference in the effect of the 2 programs for reducing ASs; however, the difference in mean scores postintervention (Cuidándome: mean 2.1, SD 2.17 vs comparison: mean 4.42, SD 4.81; P =.06) and at 6-month follow-up (Cuidándome: mean 1.65, SD 2.5 vs comparison: mean 4.0, SD 4.80; P =.06) approached significance, where Cuidándome participants reported lower AS at these time points ( Table 4 ).
Estimation errors were lower in the Welsh-medium group for all these tasks, though the difference only approached significance for the 0–100 task ( M = 19.05, SD = 5.52 for the Welsh-medium pupils compared to M = 21.69, SD = 8.42 for the English-medium pupils); and reached it for the overall estimation error score ( M = 16.06, SD = 4.66 for the Welsh-medium pupils and M = 19.1, SD = 8.57 for the English-medium pupils).