“approached significance”

No other effects were significant or approached significance (all F< 1.53, all p> .22).

When correcting for gestational age, elevated IL-6 approached significance as a predictor for worse developmental outcome (OR 1.025 [0.985–1.066], p = 0.221).

None of the other factors approached significance ( p = .243).

None of the interactions approached significance (all p values > 0.25). 7 An inspection of Fig. 2 (panels A and B) indicates that RTs were extremely variable in bin 5 and for this reason we conducted a 2 × 2 × 4 repeated measures ANOVA where the slowest bin was dropped from the analysis to examine whether its inclusion might have obscured effects observed with faster and more stable RTs.

Neither correlation approached significance: baseline r = 0.23; p = 0.25; logBF = −0.5 (disattenuated r = 0.28; logBF = −0.37); response to button-press r = 0.08; p = 0.69; logBF = −0.8 (disattenuated r = 0.10; logBF = −0.77).

For the odds of SGA, whereas the interactions for the Kotelchuck Index*race/ethnicity ( P = .068) and Kessner Index*race/ethnicity ( P = .050) approached significance, the interaction for CPCI*race/ethnicity ( P = .257) did not meet the significance threshold (α = .10).

In addition, voluntary running activity was suppressed in vincristine-treated animals during the treatment interval as revealed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests, although the interaction between chemotherapy status and time approached significance (chemotherapy status: F 1, 16 = 1.318, p = 0.268; time F 35, 560 = 17.351, p < 0.001; interaction F 35, 560 = 1.398, p = 0.067) ( Fig. 3 B).

Neither of these effects approached significance at midline sites ( aspect : F (1, 31) = 1.22, p > .27; aspect × ambiguity : F (1, 31) = 2.04, p > .16).

The model of complete independence already fitted the data, G 2 (4) = 2.29, p = 0.68, and no lower-order main effects or interactions approached significance, largest G 2 = 1.15, p = 0.28.

The genetic correlation between ELF and the age slope for offspring birth weight remained negative and was almost identical in magnitude to correlation in the full model ( r A =−0.55) but, presumably owing to the substantially reduced sample size and therefore power in the restricted model, no longer approached significance ( Χ 1 2 =1.15; p =0.28; table 1 b ).

No other main effects or interactions, including those with group, approached significance (all p > 0.29).

No other main effect or interaction approached significance: nonsingleton features of the singleton target, F (1, 15) = 1.16, η p 2 = 0.07, p = 0.298; display size, F (1, 15) = 0.00, η p 2 = 0.00, p = 0.991; Target Presence × Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target, F (1,15) = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.00, p = 0.944; Target Presence × Display Size, F (1, 15) = 1.56, η p 2 = 0.09, p = 0.230; Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target × Display Size, F (1, 15) = 0.52, η p 2 = 0.03, p = 0.481; Target Presence × Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target × Display Size, F (1,15) = 0.77, η p 2 = 0.05, p = 0.409.

None of the other relatedness contrasts approached significance (all p-values > .3).

There was a slight tendency for diagnostic group to interact with SOA, χ 2 = 11.01, p = .09, but no interactions involving congruency approached significance, p ≥ .30, nor did age or nonverbal cognitive ability influence accuracy, p ≥ .58.

While no further two- or three-way interaction approached significance, F s < 1.23, p > 0.30, η p 2 < 0.03, however, the overall four-way interaction Cue × Contingency × Face Category × Time was significant, F (11,473) = 3.82, p < 0.023, η p 2 = 0.08, indicating that instructed threat and reversal effects evolved over time specifically for unknown face pictures (Fig. 3 B).

Also, in female-choice trials, females appeared to be more discriminatory (i.e., I PSI approached significance) when they were courted by both males instead of just one of them ( I PSI = 0.249, P = 0.314 in trials with one courting male vs.

Neither main effect nor the interaction approached significance, all F (1, 100) < 1, all p >.35, all η p 2 <.01.

No statistically significant differences were found in OS or DSS based on ILI line of therapy (although DSS between therapies approached significance) ( P = 0.35 and P = 0.07, respectively) ( Figure 2 ).

In partial agreement with this interpretation, the interaction was not significant for the first maze but approached significance for the last maze (first maze: F = 0.827, p = 0.368, ns; last maze: F = 3.702, p = 0.061).

On multivariable analysis, lower SHLP2 was linked with increased risk of overall, low-, and high-grade PCa in white men (all p < 0.038), but none of these associations even approached significance in black men (all p > 0.37) (Table 3 ).

The initial MFI values did not significantly differ between those treated successfully and those with persistent CDC positivity; however, the difference in class II approached significance (class I P = 0.3746, class II P = 0.0542).

No other interactions approached significance [ F (1,34) < 1, p > .39, η P 2 < .03 in all instances].

No differences at 2 m approached significance ( P > 0.4 in all comparisons); thus the changes in gain represent alterations in responses to the closer targets.

While the IO score and IO + /TMB high model approached significance, TMB high alone did not in this subgroup (TMB HR 0.6162, 95%CI 0.1985–1.913, p = 0.402) (Figure S2B).

≤ 2.5% was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death in men (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.516, 0.784) and a risk reduction that approached significance in women (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.518, 1.034); weight gain by sex interaction was not significant ( p = 0.43).