Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significanceP =0.091.8× alpha
Sensitivity analyses (excluding women with a reported history of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, with exclusion of premenopausal/perimenopausal women) did not show any significant change in β coefficients (data not shown), although the association between PTB and baPWV approached significance when women with prevalent hypertension were excluded ( P =0.09).
approached significanceP =0.091.8× alpha
The CHD incidence rate was increased at the highest level of GI exposure (mean GI of 84.4 GI units, range 79.9 to 91) relative to the lowest (mean GI of 72.3 GI units, range 68.1 to 77), RR=1.11, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.24, and approached significance ( P =0.09) but with significant evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 =45%, P =0.05).
approached significancep = 0.091.8× alpha
The frequency by language group interaction approached significance ( z = 1.68, p = 0.09; see Fig. 4 b): English and Italian participants had a similar probability to be inaccurate in the case of medium-frequency words (emtrend = 0.22, SE = 0.24, z < 1, n.s.), while they differed for low-frequency words (emtrend = 0.63, SE = 0.22, z = 2.84, p < 0.05), with a higher probability to be inaccurate in the English group (15.1%) than in the Italian one (7.7%), and larger frequency effect among English participants (emtrend = 1.67, SE = 0.17, z = 9.83, p < 0.0001) than Italian ones (emtrend = 1.26, s.e. = 0.18, z = 7.15, p < 0.0001).
approached significanceP = 0.091.8× alpha
Correlations between representational similarity and vividness of imagery approached significance for the left SMA cluster ( r = −0.23, P = 0.09; after regressing out demographic and cognitive variables, r = −0.33, P = 0.01), but they were nonsignificant for the left inferior parietal ( r = −0.10, P = 0.48; after regressing out demographic and cognitive variables, r = −0.10, P = 0.45) and right superior parietal clusters ( r = −0.12, P = 0.39; after regressing out demographic and cognitive variables, r = −0.09, P = 0.5).
approached significanceP =.091.8× alpha
In the final model with all the predictors entered, information literacy (2-tailed t 149 =−3.26; P =.001) and interpersonal trust (t 149 =2.85; P =.005) were statistically significant; trust in health authority approached significance (t 149 =1.72; P =.09); immune system knowledge and science literacy were not significant with the other factors in the model.