The overall methylation rate of CpG sites 4–20 from –96 upstream to 416 bp downstream of the TSS of the NPY gene approached significance ( p = 0.0811), where methylation in stressed chicks tended to be lower than in non-stressed ones ( Figure 5 E).
The most skewed species-quartet (owl, cuckoo-roller, eagle 2, seriema) approached significance ( p = 0.0817).
MAA was correlated with time to weight bearing (r=0.365, p=0.005), weight (r=0.503, p<0.001), BMI (r=0.280, p=0.03), and approached significance with age (r=0.230, p=0.082).
At 48 hours: 0 μM 1.000±0.031; 10 μM 0.732±0.049; 20 μM 0.661±0.052; 50 μM 0.384±0.047; all three concentrations were lower than control (all P <0.001), and the difference between 10 and 20 μM approached significance ( P =0.082), suggesting convergence with prolonged exposure.
For instance, the difference between CoPilot and Gemini Paid approached significance ( p = 0.082, d = – 0.35), suggesting potential trends worthy of further exploration.
The interaction between these two factors approached significance ( F (1,14) = 3.521, p = 0.082), because there was no difference between the two levels of VSTM load when the distracters were very similar to the target ( t (14) = 0.648, p = 0.527), but there was when the distracters became more dissimilar ( t (14) = 3.928, p = 0.002).
However, the interaction effect approached significance, F (1, 128) = 3.07, p = 0.082, ηp 2 = 0.023, indicating a small effect size.
12 The study found that the difference in the average horizontal angle approached significance: 38.9o ± 8.2o for screws without breach compared with 44.4o ± 6.8o for those demonstrating a posterior breach ( P = 0.082), effectively showing that very slight changes in angulation can produce risky cortical breaches, requiring salvage of path through repositioning.
Emotional abuse approached significance ( p = 0.082).
Additionally, sagittal plane angular velocity of the foot at toe-off approached significance (carbon-fiber: 953.1±227.9deg/sec, traditional: 881.0±216.1deg/sec, P=0.082, Cohen’s d =0.326).
Additionally, the increased percentage of patients with contaminated culture(s) and obesity approached significance ( P = 0.082).
Cattle with medium body condition scores had a higher positivity rate (8.87%) compared to those with good scores (2.08%), but this only approached significance ( p = 0.082).
WHO grade approached significance with WHO grade 3 having an odds ratio of 4.67 for developing a recurrence compared to WHO grade 2 ( p = 0.082), and an odds-ratio of 4.17 for developing an in-field recurrence ( p = 0.061).
The age × TDF interaction approached significance ( p = 0.082), suggesting a possible age-dependent amplification of TDF’s effect.
Interestingly, TEPS-ANT made a modest contribution to prediction that approached significance, β = .19, t = 1.77, p = .082.
Simple effects analysis indicated a difference between the UHR− and UHR+ groups in the number of anticipatory responses to NPE stimuli that approached significance in block 1 (F(1, 245) = 3.05, MSE = 2.61, p = .082, 95% confidence interval of difference −.05 to .77) and reached significance in block 2 (F(1, 245) = 8.28, MSE = 5.03, p = .004, 95% confidence interval of difference .26 to 1.40).
The interaction between type of stimulus and lexicality approached significance in the analyses by participants, F 1(1,26) = 3.28, p = .082; F 2 < 1—this reflected a small overall advantage of SIM vs.
The Control and Reflux w/PPI >30 days groups differed in richness ( P = 0.023) and approached significance in Shannon diversity ( P = 0.082).
This effect approached significance ( P = .082) ( Tables 3 and 4 ; Figures 5 and 6 ).
after’ approached significance ( t = − 1.788, p = 0.082).
The difference between TD and FXS-O approached significance ( p = 0.082, d = 0.56).
Contrast analyses showed a decrease in negative deactivating affect between Time 0 and Time 1 in the self-compassion condition that approached significance ( M diff = −0.25, p = 0.082), and an increase in the control condition that approached significance ( M diff = 0.24, p = 0.069).
Food security predicted sustainable preferences (β = 0.097, 95% CI [0.045–0.149], p = 0.001), while the interaction term approached significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082).
Survival curves between categories approached significance ( p = 0.082), with screen-detected cancer demonstrating better survival ( Figure 2 ).
The Time × Group interaction approached significance, F (1,62) = 3.12, p = .082, η G 2 = .01 , η p 2 = .05 .