“approached significance”

From the second group, Alzheimer's approached significance but did not reach it (p = 0.069).

Finally, the three-way interaction between donor’s identifiability, recipients’ identifiability and the number of recipients approached significance F (1, 295) = 3.23, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.011.

The multivariate effect of condition approached significance, F (2, 57) = 2.80, p = .069, η 2 p = .09.

That is, while it was discovered that the soleus did have a greater total branch length than both the plantaris and the EDL, post-hoc analysis showed that it reached the level of statistical significance only when the soleus was compared to the plantaris ( p < 0.001); when compared to the EDL, the branch length of the soleus only approached significance ( p = 0.069).

0%) whereas the prevalence of pallidal T2-abnormalities approached significance in premutation carriers compared with controls after age-adjustment (25.1 vs. 13.4%, p = 0.069).

There was however no overall main effect of stimulus F (1, 29) = 2.690, p = 0.112 or of gas using a 2 (stimulus: preexposed, non-preexposed) × 2 (gas: CO 2 , medical air) repeated measures ANOVA but the overall 2-way interaction between stimulus × gas approached significance F (1, 29) = 3.554, p = 0.069, partial η 2 = 0.109.

The difference in the proportion of food expenditure spent on NSFV according to household size also approached significance (P = 0.069).

The Time × Group interaction approached significance, F (2, 6) =4.31, P = 0.069, η2p =0.59.

The interaction between market culture and work engagement approached significance (β = –0.130, t = − 1.826, p = .069), while the interaction between hierarchy culture and work engagement was not significant (β = –0.011, t = –0.172, p = .863).

Mice lacking 5-HT 1B R expression showed increased lick rates that approached significance ( Fig. 4C , D ; F 1,9 = 4.3, p = 0.069).

Egger’s test approached significance ( p = 0.069).

Child alive status approached significance, with surviving children showing lower LBW odds (AOR = 0.51; p = 0.069), consistent with the documented link between LBW and neonatal mortality.

All other effects were not significant, p s > 0.178, although the main effect of Dyslexia approached significance, F (1,37) = 3.51, p = 0.069, η 2 = 0.09, suggesting a trend for shorter latencies in dyslexics relative to typical readers.

A higher DEFC score was significantly associated with being Asian (p = 0.047) and CLW (p<0.001), and although the PSQ score approached significance at the α = 0.05 level (p = 0.069) the effect size was clinically insignificant, with an estimated difference of 0.2 units on the 5-unit DEFC scale between the highest and lowest PSQ scores observed.

2 A) approached significance, r (10) = 0.45, one-tailed p = 0.069.

The interaction between sex and body part on probability for injury approached significance ( p = 0.069; Table 3 ).

Reaction Times (RTs) The ANOVA on Reaction Times (RTs) did not show any significant interaction with the between-subjects factor Group, although the Session×Group interaction approached significance (F(1,22) = 3.67, p = .069).

TTE performance exhibited significant main effects for both cooling (p = 0.003) and HAE (p = 0.002), while the interaction effect approached significance (p = 0.069).

The main effect of PrePost approached significance, F(1,28)=3.58, p=0.069, partial eta squared=0.113.

By contrast, other scales, including days of relief, showed no significant sex differences, although the overall PGIC approached significance (effect of sex: F = 3.421, P = 0.069, partial η 2 = 0.051). 3.7.

FIB-4 categories approached significance ( p = 0.069), suggesting a potential, though less clear, link to cIMT.

However, there was one cluster in the left motor cortex that was more active for nonembodied compared to embodied verbs that approached significance ( p = 0.069 FWE‐corrected, resulting in an extent threshold of k = 133 voxels). 6.2.2.

The results showed that the priming effect approached significance, F = 3.51, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.084, indicating lower activation in the attachment security priming condition than in the control priming condition.

However, a GLMM cross‐group analysis for the use of “back” approached significance ( F (3, 120) = 2.452, p = .069), mainly driven by painters versus architects ( t = 2.49, df = 120, p = .084).

The time * occupational status interaction term approached significance ( p = 0.069) (Figure 5 ).