Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep = .0651.3× alpha
However, we found only partial support for these conditional relationships in Study 2: after accounting for the suppressor variables, the conditional effects were significant among Democrats ( B = .69, SE = .15, t (812) = 4.58, p = < .001) and Independents ( B = .69, SE = .19, t (812) = 3.66, p = < .001), but only approached significance among Republicans ( B = .36, SE = .20, t (812) = 1.85, p = .065).
approached significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons revealed significantly greater α-full power in the MA than the WS group at the central ( p = 0.005, d = 1.32), parietal ( p = 0.050, d = 0.87), and occipital ( p = 0.004, d = 1.31) locations, and numerically greater α-full power in the MA group which approached significance compared with the CA group at the central ( p = 0.065, d = 0.80) and occipital ( p = 0.066, d = 0.79) locations.
approached significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
No statistically significant differences in Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, or Turnover Intention across nurse designations (Charge Nurse, Staff Nurse, Practical Nurse), although Practical Nurses reported slightly more favorable scores, particularly in burnout, which approached significance ( p = 0.065).
approached significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
In control camel females (CON), correlations between various hormones, cytokines and antioxidants revealed negative relationship between inhibin and T4 (−0.94; p = 0.02), between E2 and P4 (−0.98; p = 0.005), between DHEA and T4 (−0.98; p = 0.003), between P4 and GSH (−0.96; p = 0.009), IL-ß and GSH (−0.92; p = 0.03), and the relationship between FSH and inhibin approached significance (−0.85; p = 0.065).
approached significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Differences in discrimination performance between treatments approached significance (Friedman’s test: n = 5(8), χ 2 = 14.73, p = 0.065) but subsequent post-hoc analyses (pair-wise Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests followed by the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing) revealed that discrimination performance in all tasks was statistically indistinguishable (all pairwise comparisons: adjusted p = 1).