“approached significance”

The amplitude differences between standard and deviant for the foreign contrast over the N250–550 time window only approached significance, F (1,17) = 4.0 P = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.191, and observed power = 0.471.

However, blood glucose in the CHO condition approached significance (p = 0.06) to being higher (113.4±18.0 mg · dL -1 ), when compared to PLA (93.6±9.0 mg · dL -1 ) (Figure 2 ), at the end of the tennis match play.

Interestingly, MHO women self-reported approximately 2 hours less total sitting time compared to MUO women and this difference approached significance (p = 0.06).

The same was observed for the RH group (ROI values: z = −0.98, p = 0.33; SM activation: z = −1.68, p = 0.09), although difference in ROI volumes approached significance due to lower volume associated with the LHM condition ( z = −1.82, p = 0.06).

The full model approached significance, F (6, 53) = 2.19, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.20.

The intervention led to a significant improvement in oral health measured by the OHAT after 14 days and a reduction in care-resistant behaviour that approached significance (p=.06).

In contrast to these concerns regarding overload and progression, absolute NS significantly increased from baseline to post‐intervention in Llf ( t (12) = −3.51, p = 0.02), Rlf ( t (12) = −2.92, p = 0.01), and Flx ( t (12) = −3.46, p = 0.01), whilst increases in Ext approached significance ( t (12) = −1.69, p = 0.06).

Language-foraging interaction approached significance [ F (1, 30) = 3.77, p = 0.06], as did foraging-housing interaction [ F (1, 30) = 3.49, p = 0.07].

For staff lines, the Group × Stimulus (staff lines/Landolt Cs) interaction on log contrast threshold approached significance, F (1, 30) = 3.79, p = .06.

DBP approached significance (P = 0.06), likely limited by small sample sizes and measurement heterogeneity (ambulatory vs. office BP) ( De Bhailis and Kalra, 2022 ; Chen et al., 2021 ).

Five respondents underwent amputation, with lower SF-6D scores that approached significance (0.48 versus 0.6, P = 0.06).

The Mann-Whitney test indicated no significant difference between the groups on day 3 ( p = 1.000) and approached significance on day 7 ( p = 0.060) ( Table 1 ).

In the univariate logistic regression analyses, there were no neonatal characteristics that were statistically significantly associated with the composite kidney outcome although neonatal hypotension approached significance with a wide confidence interval (OR 3.52, 95%CI 0.94, 13.17; p = 0.06).

The interaction between distractor probability and distractor presence approached significance, F (1,50) = 3.68, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.

In the cross-model analysis ( Table 2 , Table 3 ), the only statistically significant difference observed was maxillary width (mx FA) according to the SDSC.R ( p <0.00); in the PSQ, the value approached significance ( p < 0.06), with a smaller maxillary width in the group with respiratory sleep disorders.

A three-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of Sex (p = 0.05) and Genotype (p < 0.001) and approached significance for Age (p = 0.06).

When percent weight loss was adjusted to remove the weight gain attributable to the gains themselves, differences in weight loss between individuals who had zero gain, one gain or two gains approached significance ( p = 0.06).

Effect sizes of d ≥ 0.2 were generally associated with statistically significant results, although both CRT overall and RRT produced effect sizes for energy drink contrasted with energy drink placebo of just over d = 0.2, reflecting faster responses after energy drink that approached significance ( P = 0.06).

However, the 3-to 6-month slope only approached significance, p = 0.06.

Paired-sample t -tests demonstrated greater ERF amplitude in response to infant cries, compared with adult cries that was significant at 100 ms [ t (24) = 1.97, P = 0.03, r = 0.37] and approached significance at 200 ms [ t (24) = 1.64, P = 0.06, r = 0.32] in maximally responsive channels in the right hemisphere.

Survival analysis revealed significant separation, log-rank p<0.05: MDC-T2 projected onto T1 distinguished patients by both OS ( figure 5D ) and PFS ( online supplemental figure S5B ), and T3 projection maintained significance for OS and approached significance for PFS (p=0.06).

Control participants' self-ratings were not related to error on the OPT, r (16) = −.36, p = .14 but just approached significance for the JRD task, r (16) = −.45, p = .06.

Similarly, for anxiety, those living alone presented higher scores ( M = 11.51, SD = 9.93) than those living with others ( M = 8.67, SD = 8.44), but the difference only approached significance, p = 0.061, η 2 = 0.01, with a small effect size.

For errors, the main effect of target/distracter approached significance [ F (1,12) = 4.251, p = 0.061], with distracter trials being more error-prone (target: 12% errors; distracter: 16% errors).

The difference between males and females approached significance ( p = 0.061).