approached significanceP = 0.040
The interaction between cue conditions and target conditions approached significance [ F (6336) = 2.225, P = 0.040].
The interaction between cue conditions and target conditions approached significance [ F (6336) = 2.225, P = 0.040].
Negative usability comments for the 4SQT approached significance ( W =4.1; P =.04; Table 1 ), but this result was not statistically significant.
However, FA was significantly higher in the older children at a specific location medial to the central sulcus (marked by an arrow in figure 3a ) in the left hemisphere (FA older children = 0.51, FA younger children = 0.46, t = 3.64, p<0.05 corrected) and approached significance at the same location in the right hemisphere (FA older children = 0.48, FA younger children = 0.44, t = 2.13, p = 0.04 uncorrected).
However, the association between sleep problems and cortisol 20 minutes post-task that approached significance in the main models, reached significance when removing non-white participants from the analysis ( B = -0.035, C.I. = -0.069 to -0.002, p = 0.040) 4.
In addition, the difference in CRP levels over time between the two groups approached significance ( P = 0.04).
The direct effect for caregiver fidelity approached significance ( p = 0.04), with an inverse association, but did not meet our conservative critical value of p ≤ 0.01.
No main effect for Retrieval-Status was found ( F (1,81) = 1.25, MSE = .03 η 2 p = .02, p = .268) but the Retrieval-Status x WMC interaction approached significance ( F (1,81) = 3.78, MSE = .08 η 2 p = .04, p = .055), indicating a trend toward the result observed in the full, more powerful analysis.
F2 contrast approached significance ( p = 0.041).
None of the other effects approached significance (all F s < 2.13, P s > 0.15, η 2 P < 0.041, η 2 G < 0.009).
This between-treatment difference in OS approached significance in the PAS (median OS 180 vs. 83 days, respectively; HR 0.39; p = 0.042) ( Figure 5 ).
Egger’s regression test was nonsignificant (z = 1.76, p = 0.106), although Begg’s rank correlation test approached significance ( p = 0.042), suggesting the possibility of small-study effects.
Notably, insulin levels approached significance ( P = 0.042), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.961 (95% CI: 0.925–0.999), suggesting a potential protective effect of higher insulin levels against low BMD.
The correlation between SCQ score and mood score approached significance ( r s (28) = − .37, p = .043).
For intimacy quality, although relational length ( β = −0.023, SE = −0.01, p = 0.117) was not significant, female percentage ( β = −0.015, SE = 0.008, p = 0.0704) approached significance, and age ( β = −0.0133, SE = 0.006, p = 0.0439) had a significant association.
For switch trials, there were no significant effects involving SwitchProb, whereas the analysis of repetitions showed an interaction of SwitchProb and RCI which approached significance, F (1, 47) = 4.27, p = .044 (Bonferroni-corrected p = .088), η p 2 = .083.
Though only the usefulness of SL for social interaction approached significance ( P =.046) there was improvement across three of the four questions from baseline to follow-up.
The rate of increasing CDR-SB score reached or approached significance in the model comparing the HS-A group to all other groups (LATE-NC: 1.45, 95% CI [0.13, 2.74], p = 0.046; ADNC: 2.1, 95% CI [0.61, 3.5], p = 0.012; no pathology: 0.96, 95% CI [−0.041, 1.96], p = 0.093).
At greater threshold distances fewer of the comparisons approached significance, except when >6–8 km was compared with >8 km at severe and ultrasevere cut-offs (P=0.046 and P=0.056).
Significant interaction effects between group and assessment time points approached significance ( F = 3.28, p = 0.046, η 2 p = 0.038).
The duration effect on viewing distance approached significance ( p = 0.046) but did not survive Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0125).
Between-group differences in the Trusting subscale scores approached significance ( p = 0.046), with the CTD group more likely to experience the body as untrustworthy.
Nevertheless, multilinear regression analysis of RT (change angle, average d′, and bias as predictors; see materials and methods ) revealed a more negative standardized regression coefficient for RT variation with bias as compared with d′, that approached significance (β b-LR = −0.082 [−0.21 0.05], β d′ = −0.019 [−0.069 0.071] – median [95% confidence interval]; P = 0.046, bootstrap test for difference of β-magnitudes).
The likelihood ratio test approached significance [ χ 2 (2) = 6.140, P = 0.046], while the linear-by-linear association test did not indicate a significant trend [ χ 2 (1) = 0.473, P = 0.492].
The comparison to ResNet50 approached significance ( p = 0.046891), indicating that ODConv and ResNet50 perform similarly but with a measurable advantage.
With ASVs collapsed by genus, taxon-by-taxon analysis revealed Streptococcus comprised a larger relative abundance in R than NR lesional skin (p=0.008, q=0.08) after phototherapy; this comparison approached significance in non-lesional skin (p=0.047, q=0.260).