Effect sizes of d ≥ 0.2 were generally associated with statistically significant results, although both CRT overall and RRT produced effect sizes for energy drink contrasted with energy drink placebo of just over d = 0.2, reflecting faster responses after energy drink that approached significance ( P = 0.06).
Because the chi-square results for ethnicity and PHQ-9 severity level between the two groups approached significance ( P = 0.06), we undertook additional chi-square tests to explore a possible association between ethnicity and depression severity, as measured by PHQ-9 score.
The p -value for the comparison between viral loads prior to transport and 5 days approached significance ( P = 0.06), hence a larger sample size may allow clarification of shedding patterns.
We found that IgM anti-OSP Inaba responses on day 10 following vaccination with CVD 103-HgR correlated with protection against moderate or severe diarrhea following subsequent experimental challenge (moderate or severe diarrhea versus no diarrhea; P = 0.01; Fig 4 ), and that day 10 IgA anti-OSP responses approached significance in this analysis ( P = 0.06; Fig 4 ).
BPRS negative symptoms At T1, difference between the groups approached significance (chi square = 3.487, p = 0.06).
A main effect of group approached significance [ F (2,45) = 2.98, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.12], indicating that the Sport ( M = 680.64 ms, SD = 151.02 ms) trended toward longer reaction times than Music ( M = 619.83 ms, SD = 138.76 ms) ( p < 0.001, d = 0.42) and Control ( M = 602.77 ms, SD = 137.37 ms) ( p < 0.001, d = 0.54).
Where the main effect of genotype was significant, and in a few cases where it approached significance ( p = 0.06), post hoc comparisons between each genotype were assessed using Fisher’s PLSD.
Fat mass change was significant in starters (1.8±0.5 kg; p<0.01) and approached significance in non-starters (1.1±0.6 kg; p=0.06) with the change in the starter group different from the control group but not the non-starter group.
Perceptions of network members’ healthy eating habits were positively associated with physical activity (β = 0.11, p < .01), though perceptions of network members’ physical activity only approached significance (β = 0.07, p = .06).
Although none of these analyses revealed a significant difference between the two groups, in the two-flash/one-beep condition, children with ASD (40% of trials) were more likely to report two flashes than were children with TD (17% of trials), a difference that approached significance ( t (6) = 2.38, p = 0.06).
Differences in PrEP adherence by MI Indication group approached significance at week 12 (z = 1.86, p = 0.06), such that the MI Indicated group had lower TFV levels than the MI Not Indicated group.
In comparisons of the prevalence of the conditions by age in NHANES and NHIS, we found no statistical differences between prevalence by age group ( online supplemental table 1 ), although the difference in hypertension among 40–49 years old was 6% higher in NHIS, which approached significance (p=0.06).
Likewise, testosterone injection caused a significant increase in local estradiol levels within NCM (pre-injection: 17.87 ± 8.42 (mean ± SEM pg/ml); post-injection: 41.06 ± 1.37; p = 0.05) and an increase in estradiol outside NCM that approached significance (pre-injection: 15.69 ± 4.57; post-injection: 31.22 ± 8.33; p = 0.06).
For the t -tests, bin 80–120 approached significance ( t (29) = 1.98, p = .06), but no other bin was significant except for 280–320 and 320–360 ( p = .03 and p = .02 respectively). 6.3 Studies 1 and 2 combined Given the evident similarity between the two data sets as shown in Fig. 4 , and the problem of sparseness they present, a third set of analyse
Even though the apparent difference at the maximum (t = 4h) with respect to t = 0h approached significance (p = 0.06, t test), PPIA expression throughout the entire time course was not regulated significantly (p = 0.52, ANOVA) (Figure 2B ).
the control group, the Domain × Time × Condition effect approached significance, F (2, 142) = 2.84, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.038, suggesting that the combined treatment effect was not uniform across motivational domains.
Of SPPB sub-tests, chair stands significantly correlated with the MOCA (r=0.21, p =.04), gait speed approached significance (r=0.19, p =.06), and balance was not significant (r=0.07, p =.48).
205.4 ± 52.6 Nm, p = 0.00, d = 0.48), a slight decrease for the WBC1 group that approached significance (258.2 ± 34.2 Nm vs. 243.8 ± 35.3 Nm, p = 0.06, d = 0.42) and no significant decrease for CWI (245.1 ± 76.8 Nm vs. 229.5 ± 72.7 Nm, p = 0.15, d = 0.21).
For the 4-category levels, the food-secure students (3.55 ± 1.1) were significantly lower in agreeing that their diet had changed than for the marginal (3.86 ± 1.0; p = 0.002) and very low food security students (4.04 ± 1.0; p < 0.001), while the low food-secure students approached significance (3.76 ± 1.1; p = 0.060).
This interaction term was not statistically significant, although it approached significance ( p = 0.06) in model 2 (in which the dependent variable was reported wheeze and the RHI was fitted as a continuous variable).
Positive work approached significance (p = 0.06) and peak force per push (0.40) did not change significantly between the pre- and the post-test.
The full model approached significance, F (6, 53) = 2.19, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.20.
The time by group interaction effect approached significance ( F (1, 92) = 3.76, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.04).
When exploring within-group correlations, depressed mothers continued to show no correlation between perceived and observed interaction quality, r (43) = −0.13, p = 0.40, while the correlation for mothers in the control group approached significance in the expected direction r (24) = −0.38, p = 0.06 (higher reported dysfunctional interaction associated with lower dyadic interaction quality). 3.4.
The scores of all components were sometimes slightly higher in DTC subjects than in controls, but only “Sleep efficiency” was significantly different ( P = 0.04), while the difference in “Daytime dysfunction” approached significance ( P = 0.06) (Fig. 3 ).