Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached but did not reach significance”

211 sentences · 211 papers · 355 search hits before verification

In the literature

Subgroup analyses by ethnicity Protective effects in Asian populations were consistently greater in magnitude and the associations were all statistically significant in the Asian subgroup except for CT versus TT which approached but did not reach significance ( P = 0.071) (Table 3 ).
Gait complexity was not significant ( F = 0.90, p = 0.345, η 2 p = 0.003), cognitive/speaking task approached but did not reach significance ( F = 2.34, p = 0.073, η 2 p = 0.022), and the interaction was nonsignificant ( F = 0.36, p = 0.781, η 2 p = 0.003). cDTE : the 2 (complexity) × 4 (cognitive/speaking task) ANOVA revealed no significant main effects or interactions (online suppl.
Patient Global Assessment (PGA): • Pre-treatment: Group B had slightly lower PGA scores than Group A, though the difference approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.076 ). • Post-treatment: No significant difference between groups ( p = 0.955 ), indicating similar perceived improvement. 3.
The Friedman test also detected a significant effect of time of day for the narrow land between beaches ( X 2 = 7.177, df = 2, P = 0.028), but the post hoc test showed the difference in electivity indices approached but did not reach significance between morning and midday ( P = 0.078) and between morning and afternoon ( P = 0.061).
The difference approached but did not reach significance ( P = 0.08) when African American, and Hispanic subjects were excluded from the analysis (data not shown), indicating that regulation between HLA identically matched white subjects was less robust in this cohort as compared to the previous one. 4 Analysis of Immune Responses Between Pairs of Relate
In all datasets combined, results were as follows ( Fig 14b ): Combined Stage 2 JTI = 1.81 + 0.38 * z − PC 1 (.06) (.06) Combined Stage 3 JTI = 1.59 + 0.22 * z − PC 1 (.05) (.05) Combined Stage 4 JTI = 1.24 + 0.07 * z − PC 1 (.03) (.04) Difference in Stage-2 and -3 slopes approached but did not reach significance (t = 1.75, p = .08) but Stage-3 and -4 slopes differed significantly (t = 2.25, p = .03).