“approached but did not reach significance”

Publication bias assessment approached but did not reach significance (Egger’s t = − 2.38, p = 0.063), suggesting a possible small-study effect for this outcome (Figure S6 in the supplements).

In Model 2, this difference approached but did not reach significance (p = 0.063), reinforcing the overall trend ( Table 3 ).

Only two did not, the comparison between 0 and 20 ms ( p = .248, difference = 5.0%) and that between 0 and 40 ms, which approached but did not reach significance ( p = .063, difference = 13.6%).

The effect of the surgeon’s experience and overall learning curve approached but did not reach significance for either the open RCR group (p = 0.064) or the arthroscopic RCR group (p = 0.098).

29.2% in SMT), although the difference approached but did not reach significance (p = 0.064).

However, this reduction reached statistical significance only in the TOMO_FA plans ( p = 0.027), while the reduction in TOMO_RE approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.064).

Distance band approached but did not reach significance (χ 2 = 5.47, p = 0.065).

The main effect of the length of the clip approached but did not reach significance, F (2, 46) = 2.90, p = .065.

The Shapiro–Wilk test indicated significant deviation from normality (W = 0.979, p < 0.001), while the Kolmogorov–Smirnov result approached but did not reach significance (D = 0.066, p = 0.065).

While this sample size is sufficient for the detection of the large main effects observed (concentration effects consistently reached p < 0.001), the type × concentration interaction under tensile loading approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.065), and a study with larger replication might resolve this borderline result.

The t -test showed that the difference in category clustering between the item-JOL condition ( M = 0.35, SD = 0.36) and the no-JOL condition ( M = 0.19, SD = 0.56) approached but did not reach significance, t (79) = 1.53, d = 0.34, p = .065.

Repeated measures two‐way ANOVA for factors Group (S‐R, random) and Time (1st‐10, last‐10) revealed a Group × Time interaction term that approached but did not reach significance (F (1, 14) = 3.932, p = 0.067).

The main effect of TIME for IMF power approached but did not reach significance ( F 3,33 = 2.62, p = 0.067, η 2 = 0.072).

In the SIC cohort, the INR linear term was non-significant ( p = 0.186), the quadratic term approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.067), and only the spline model captured the predictive signal (ΔAUROC + 0.021).

A similar pattern of findings emerged when the form typicality variables were entered first, although typicality for emotionality was now a significant predictor and typicality for arousal again approached but did not reach significance (p = .068).

Multivariate regression using these variables showed that TMS positive point resection was significantly predictive, while resection of the precentral gyrus approached but did not reach significance ( P = .068).

The overall difference in suppression between groups and the difference between groups across training approached but did not reach significance (main effect of group, F (1,10) = 4.13; p = 0.069; group × day interaction, F (1,10) = 4.847; p = 0.052).

Total production of melatonin during waking hours, calculated as AUC, approached but did not reach significance when correlated to total MADRS-S (ρ = -0.18, p = 0.07).

Novel-miR37 and miR-68 approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.07 and 0.08, respectively) ( Fig. 5 and Supporting Information S1, Table S19 ).

Of note, the main effect of stance on bias perceptions approached but did not reach significance, b = .04, t (1054) = 1.81, p < .07.

Performance approached but did not reach significance for the hard trials: M = 0.41 ± 0.21, t (11) = 2.01, p = 0.070, and BF = 0.11 ( Figure 7 ).

However, it is important to interpret this result with some caution, as the correlation approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.07).

Differences in time to surgery for orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups approached but did not reach significance ( P = 0.07).

Those who were redeployed trended towards a heavier workload as compared to those who were not deployed, who trended towards a lighter workload; this trend approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.07).

The comparison between Claude 3 Opus and Grok 3 approached but did not reach significance (W=30.00; P =.07; Holm α=0.017), with a medium effect size ( r =0.322).