Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
The average annual percent change (AAPC) in the incidence of gastric cancer from 2003 to 2012 among the male population, South Korea, Japan, Malta, Canada, Cyprus, and Switzerland showed an increasing trend ( P > 0.05); among the female population, Canada [AAPC, 1.2; (95%Cl, 0.5–2), P < 0.05] showed an increasing trend; and South Korea, Ecuador, Thailand, and Cyprus showed an increasing trend ( P > 0.05).
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Overall increasing or decreasing trends in femoral diaphyseal OPD by region (Table 1 ) A regression analysis to test for the presence of continual increases or decreases in the overall OPD of the femoral diaphysis showed that, for femur A, the bone density exhibited an increasing trend in the distal direction for the medial region only ( p < 0.05); the other regions did not exhibit any clear trend.
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
MUC16 expression in pre and post-treatment groups using both drugs (methotrexate and cisplatin) was up-regulated and displayed an increasing trend in the placebo (4.31–5.11%), AF(D)NMs (6.13–6.36%) and IV-drug groups (7.67–8.14%) ( p < 0.05), whilst in the NMs (D) group, MUC16 expression was down-regulated (2.67–3.3%) ( Figure 11 ).
an increasing trendP>0.051.0× alphagold
Both LOM LSPV denervation and LSG Denervation significantly reduce cardiac sympathetic nervous activity (lower LF: 1.05±1.14 vs 2.36 ± 2.34 ms 2 in group 2 and 0.51 ± 0.39 vs 2.24 ± 1.53 ms 2 in group 3; and LF/HF ratio: 0.35±0.21 vs 1.65 ± 1.04 in group 2 and 0.27±0.28 vs 1.42 ± 0.77 in group 3; all P<0.05) but neither had a significant effect on parasympathetic nervous activity though which showed an increasing trend (HF: 2.69±2.00 vs 2.01 ± 2.14 in group 2 and 2.66±1.74 vs 1.95 ± 1.60 in group 3, P>0.05).
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The results showed that the assignments of the significant voxels in V1 and V2 had a decreasing trend (Mann–Kendall test, p < 0.05) with the CNN layer, whereas the assignments of the significant voxels in V3 and V4 had an increasing trend (Mann–Kendall test, p < 0.05) for both subjects.