Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendP = 0.1483.0× alphagold
In the TWK10-hk group after 6 weeks of administration, a significant increasing trend ( P = 0.072) in the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae , a significant decrease ( P = 0.030) in the abundance of Peptostreptococcaceae , a significant decreasing trend ( P = 0.107) in the abundance of Lachnospireaceae , and an increasing trend ( P = 0.148) in the abundance of Atopobiaceae were observed as compared with before administration ( Figure S1B ).
an increasing trendp = 0.153.0× alphagold
Laboratory Parameters Values of serum urea showed an increasing trend in the EX group from baseline to the 5-year follow-up (88 ± 34 to 106 ± 40 mg/dL; t = 0.81; p = 0.15), whereas a significant increasing trend was noted in the CO group from baseline to the 5-year follow-up (86 ± 38 to 136 ± 71 mg/dL; t = 2.89; p = 0.001), with a significant between-group difference ( p = 0.039).
an increasing trendp = 0.153.0× alphagold
Acceptance in terms of TAM reached a maximum score of 51.54 in the last sampling point, also showing an increasing trend amongst data collection points ( p = 0.15 from baseline to month 6); given the small sample size of this research work, and the fact that statistical significance is a function of both the sample size and the magnitude of the estimated effect, p -values lower than 0.2 could be considered statistically significant [ 65 , 66 ].
an increasing trendp = 0.153.0× alphagold
In the first session, similar to that observed for subjects in the short-term study, VOR responses showed a decreasing trend for HR peak eye velocity and an increasing trend for LR peak eye velocity (Figure 2A ), the changes were not significant for HR (35.0 ± 3.6 vs. 26.0 ± 4.4°/s, paired t -test, p = 0.15) or LR (25.0 ± 2.2 vs. 26.75 ± 5.3°/s, paired t -test, p = 0.23).
an increasing trendP value = 0.1523.0× alphagold
G 2 with magnesium treatment also had no such good impact on FBG levels, such as 115.0 ± 2.3 to 232 ± 124.7 values showing an increasing trend as P value = 0.152, which shows that magnesium had no effect in lowering blood glucose levels, instead of it magnesium in this study had no positive effects, magnesium solely caused bloating and constipation in rats.