Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

There was a significant negative correlation between the FEV1 (%) and FVC (%) with that of BMI and WHR in contrast to a previously published study, which noted a positive correlation between BMI and pulmonary function test.[ 19 ] Our results are in accordance with studies where BMI and WHR are negatively correlated to pulmonary function test.[ 24 ] Yet another study had reported a significant (or almost significant) inverse correlation with residual FVC, FEV 0.75 , and FEV 1 among boys with over-weight and obesity.[ 16 ] BMI also showed inverse correlations with residual FVC and FEV 1 , both of which were border-line significant.
[ 18 ], had shown that preterm babies ≤32 weeks’ gestation resuscitated with lower (0.21–0.3) versus higher (0.6–1.0) initial FiO 2 showed no differences in morbidity but exhibited an almost significant trend towards reduced mortality [ 18 ], both the TORPIDO trial from Australia/New Zealand/Malaysia [ 19 ] and the Neonatal Network in Canada [ 20 ] reported increased mortality in very preterm babies initially stabilized with air.
Temporal assessment of changes in parasite infection status identified significant relationships with year of sampling, with a significant decrease in prevalence in 2021, and an almost significant decrease in 2013, with the variable “year” of maximum importance and present in all top models (Table 2 ).
Unexpectedly, our results have shown that there is a trend for fathers having 1.1 times stronger preferences for feminine faces than childless men (OR = 1.11 [0.99–1.24]; F 1,25725 = 3.57; P = 0.059, S14), but this almost significant effect varied strongly between men with different siblings’ age, number and sex (for additional details, see S15–S17).
Hematocrit was non-significantly lower at each of the three individual assessment points for Intervention compared to Control arms (Δ = − 0.52 ± 0.54; p = 0.34 for pre-training, Δ = − 0.82 ± 0.14; p = 0.14 for post training and Δ = − 0.99 ± 0.56; p = 0.08 for recovery; mixed effects model comparing arms at each time point) although the difference was almost significant at the final measurement.
The discrepancies between both reports would be related to the low number of human samples and the almost significant difference in the age between control and AAA groups in the study conducted by Gao et al., to the heterogeneity of human aneurysmal lesions, and, regarding preclinical studies, to differences in the mouse models of AAA [ 125 ].