“almost significant”

However, a lower level of participant-reported SCCs (negative beta values) for this late progression was almost significant ( p = 0.059).

Cosinor analysis revealed almost significant 12-h ( p = 0.059), not 24-h ( p = 0.107) variability (Supplementary Table 2 ).

In July 2008, the difference was almost significant ( p = 0.059).

A significant decrease in average reaction time (t(22) = 2.16, P = 0.042) and an almost significant decrease in reaction time for stimuli on the blind side (t(22) = 1.99, P = 0.059) were found for the training group, while no such effects were found for the waiting list control group ( P > 0.100).

The analyses of the accuracy data revealed an almost significant linear contrast of the auditory-cue*target-saliency interaction (F(1.28) = 3.88, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.12).

The results were almost significant ( p =0.059).

An almost significant difference was found for the physical domain [ F (1,57) = 3.73, p = 0.059].

8.6 ± 2.5%) which was almost significant ( p = 0.059).

When parents were the informants, the difference was almost significant, p = 0.059.

Regarding the vestibular system, we did not find statistically significant differences in the Fakuda-Unterberger test (p = 0.48), but we did observe almost significant results in the Barany test (p = 0.059).

E2 has almost significant (p = 0.059) procapacitation effect on boar sperm (Fig. 4 ).

Consequently, one case in the duraplasty group needed reoperation, whereas five cases in the non-duraplasty group needed reoperation, which is almost significant ( p =0.059) ( Table 2 ).

An almost significant decrease was observed for IL6 expression ( p = 0.059).

Smoking habit over the 3 months prior to pregnancy also did not show a significant association, though an almost significant result was observed after adjustment (adjOR 3.75, 95% CI 0.95–14.76, p = 0.059).

This was partly due to their high mean in self‐direction (the difference between the groups in self‐direction was almost significant, t (354) = −1.896, p = .059).

Expression levels of BigDop1 were significantly lower in gynes than in workers (Mann-Whitney U-test, z = −1.965, P < 0.05; Fig 4A ), but expression levels of the other three tested genes did not differ significantly between castes ( BigDop2 : z = −1.890, P = 0.059; BigDop3 : z = −1.587, P = 1.112; BigDopEcR : z = −0.302, P = 0.762; Fig 4B–4D ), although levels of BigDop2 were almost significant ( P = 0.059).

Furthermore, we found an almost significant effect ( p = 0.059) of disturbance by music for Mystery.

AUC-conversion showed significant effects of injection-group, and an almost significant volume-response relationship in males (Linear regression, P = 0.059), but only when the control-group was included in the correlation (Fig. 4 C).

The difference in anxiety evolution between drinkers with and without alcohol misuse was significant in participants with high perceived loneliness (β=0.64; p=0.016) and almost significant in women (β=0.24; p=0.059).

Age turned out to be almost significant ( F (1,23) = 3.922 p = 0.059, η 2 p = 0.1456), showing an increase of performance in both groups. 3.2.3.

In fact, the expression of Cytochrome C oxidase subunit VI gene is remarkable high, at levels that are almost significant(p = 0.059), which would fit into the theory of the mitochondria overworking during N . ceranae infection.

This is strong evidence for variation in pathogenicity and possible occurrence of races within Aaa as the variety x strain interaction effect was almost significant ( P = 0.0591).

Enhanced ADCC Activity in PBMCs from Oncohematological Individuals after ASCT Antibody-mediated cytotoxic activity against rituximab-coated Raji cells of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBMCs) from oncohematological patients was increased 2.1-fold on average after ASCT, in comparison with healthy donors who recovered from mild COVID-19 ( Figure 3 ), but this difference was almost significant ( p = 0.0592). 3.5.

A significant intergroup difference (*; p < 0.05) between pre surgery and after the infusion of 500 ml of dextran was seen for EXTEM A10 ( p = 0.0456), and the difference remained almost significant until post surgery ( p = 0.0594).

Model 1 revealed an almost significant increase in body area satisfaction during the intervention (b = 0.698, t(136.24) = 1.899, p = .0597) and no change afterwards.