Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantP value = 0.0581.2× alphagold
and OTU_0011 Boudiera spp.) were positively correlated with yield under control conditions ( P value < 0.01; R > 0.10), while two showed a negative correlation, one under control conditions (OTU_0001 Chaetomiaceae; P value = 0.003; R = − 0.18) and one under drought that was almost significant (OTU_0019 Rhizophydiales; P value = 0.058; R = − 0.11) (Fig. 2 a).
almost significantp = 0.05871.2× alphagold
Total PBMCs had an almost significant increase in leptin secretion after incubation with 25 mM glucose vs. 5.5 mM glucose ( p = 0.0587) and a significant increase after treatment with 45 mM glucose compared to 5.5 mM glucose ( p < 0.0005) and 25 mM glucose ( p < 0.005) ( Figure 6 A).
almost significantp = 0.05881.2× alphagold
There was also a significant diet-genotype interaction on microgliosis in the internal capsule ( F 1,40 = 4.250, p = 0.0458 and F 1,20 = 6.06, p = 0.023 for cell count) and fimbria ( F 1,12 = 12.09, p = 0.0046 and F 1,12 = 12.43, p = 0.0042 for cell count), and almost significant interaction in the corpus callosum ( F 1,40 = 3.809, p = 0.0588).
almost significantp=0.05891.2× alphagold
As reported before, also B cells were higher in ASCT+ patients (11.43 ± 11.0% vs 6.5 ± 6.6%, p<0.0001), with significant increase in CD19+/CD5- B cells (4.6± 4.8% vs 2.1± 2.8%, p<0.0001) and an almost significant increase of CD19+/CD5+ B cells (1.9 ± 3.1% vs 1.3 ± 2.3%, p=0.0589) ( Supplementary Figures 5C–E ).
almost significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Spontaneous alternation in the Y-maze Regarding short-term memory assessment, two-way analysis of the percentage of time spent in the novel arm [(time spent in the novel arm divided by three arms) × 100], revealed an effect of the treatment ( F (1,56) = 20.282, p < 0.001) and an almost significant interaction sex*treatment ( F (1,56) = 3.706, p = 0.059), but no effects of sex ( F (1,56) = 1.013, p = 0.318) during the test phase (Figure 4 ).
almost significantP = .0591.2× alphagold
Effects upon overall score were estimated with a regression model in which there were significant effects of three best A-level grades (beta = .205, P <.001) and secondary school-level average points (beta = −.085, P = .005), and an almost significant effect of selective secondary schooling (beta = −.056, P = .059), the fitted regression lines being shown in Figure 3 a.
almost significantP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
A significant decrease in average reaction time (t(22) = 2.16, P = 0.042) and an almost significant decrease in reaction time for stimuli on the blind side (t(22) = 1.99, P = 0.059) were found for the training group, while no such effects were found for the waiting list control group ( P > 0.100).