Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
The effect of claw on the variance of the difference between the two measures was almost significant at the 5% level (−2LL difference 48.2; df.18; p = 0.054); the standard deviation of the difference between the two methods was greatest for the left front lateral claw (0.78 cm) and lowest for the left hind lateral claw (0.53 cm). 3.4.
almost significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
a trend towards significancep = .0671.3× alpha
Cox proportional hazards regression analysis considering only tumour region volumes provided an almost significant model: − 2 log-likelihood = 146.066, χ 2 (4) = 9.303, and p = .054 with a trend towards significance of the hazard function: p = .067 and HR = 1.077 for the non-enhancing tumour volume.
almost significantp = 0.05451.1× alphagold
2c – upper row) led to an almost significant Exposure by Sound interaction (b = 0.38, p = 0.0545). fMRI activity during the auditory post-test trials During the post-test trials blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity was elicited across a broad network of perceptual, motor and fronto-parietal regions, reflecting listening to the ambiguous sounds and making /aba/–/ada/ judgments (once the fixation cross turned green).
almost significantp = .0551.1× alphagold
These main effects were qualified by significant interactions of orientation and country, F (1, 161) = 20.28, p < .001, η p 2 = .112 (indicating a larger RT difference between horizontal and vertical oriented materials in the Malaysian sample compared to the German sample), as well as of compatibility and SOA, F (6, 322) = 15.02, p < .001, η p 2 = .219, and by an almost significant interaction of orientation, country, and SOA, F (3, 161) = 2.58, p = .055, η p 2 = .046.
almost significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
The results revealed that the total reads of GH families, which were responsible for hemicellulose degradation, were significantly higher in wild and half-blood yaks than in domestic yaks (Welch t -test, p < 0.05) ( Figure 4A ), and the total reads of GH families, which were responsible for cellulose degradation, were almost significant between wild and half-blood yak (Welch t -test, p = 0.055) ( Figure 4B ).
almost significantp=0.0551.1× alphagold
However, in both two-way ANOVA and mixed model for between-subject variance, there are significant genotype effects and training effects but only an almost significant (p=0.055) genotype x training effect, meaning that the bigger effect is that Mecp2 duplication mice generally eliminate less synapses and that training in general leads to more synapses elimination.