“almost significant”

However, in the SBP course the overall interaction with TG, and in the DBP course the overall interaction with FFA, were almost significant (p = 0.053 and p = 0.064, respectively).

Furthermore, the almost significant trend showed by the T-test against baseline (value 1) ( t (13) = −2.13, p = 0.053) indicated that the MEP suppression during reading positive hand related sentences was a genuine inhibition of the cortico-spinal excitability.

The difference of both groups (R: Mean = 166.5 ± 24.6; NR: Mean = 190.0 ± 19.0) in the 2MWT was almost significant (t(14) = 2.11, p = 0.053).

Results With regard to maximum load, we observed an almost significant interaction between treatment and time ( F = 2.62, df = 4, p = 0.053).

A paired samples t-test revealed that participants continued to report significantly lower tobacco cigarette use at 1 month ( M 2 = 2.94) compared to baseline [ M 1 = 12.20; t (22) = 6.937, p < 0.001; Figure 4 ], confirmed by an almost significant reduction in breath CO [ M 1 = 12.26, M 2 = 9.52; t (22) = 2.044, p = 0.053; Figure 4 ].

There was an almost significant difference ( p = 0.053 for the heat acclimatization × training interaction).

Recovery elicited a significant decline ( p = 0.032) in levels of muscle atrogin-1 along with an almost significant decrease ( p = 0.053) in proteasome content and total protein ubiquitination ( p = 0.005) but not MuRF-1 compared to immobilized animals ( Figure 5 A–E and Figures S4–S7 ).

O’Brien staging [ 5 ] for overall survival was almost significant for P1 versus P2 + P3 ( P = 0.0531).

While their size was unaffected, an almost significant (p = 0.0531) 13.7 ± 2.8% reduction in the fEV count was measured at the highest sPLA 2 -IIA concentration tested (Fig. 4D, E ).

Group affiliation showed significant influences on the relation between empathy and TMT‐A ( t = −2.6045, p = .0117), empathy, and TMT‐B ( t = −2.6608, p = .0102) as well as an almost significant moderating effect on the relation between empathy and executive control questions ( t = −1.9827, p = .0532).

After 48 hours, there was a significant reduction of miR-221 expression that was almost significant for miR-222 ( P = .0537).

where RI was only almost significant ( p < 0.0539).

The regression test also showed an almost significant publication bias among the studies ( P = .054).

The association between type of offence (aggravated or basic), and gender was almost significant ( p = 0.054), where 56% of defendants committing a basic offence were males, compared to 76% for aggravated offences ( Table 5 ).

Interestingly, we also found that in the subgroup with a low TMB score, patients with MGA mutation had better ICI-related OS and the result was almost significant (log-rank test, p = 0.054, Supplementary Figure 2B ), whereas the association was not significant in the subgroup with a high TMB score (log-rank test, p = 0.416, Supplementary Figure 2C ).

However, an almost significant relationship between current anxiety and hyperintensities or lacunes observed at neuroimaging emerged (Fisher’s exact p = 0.054).

This difference was driven by a sex-dependent effect of trauma exposure, which was associated with an increase of MECP2 expression selectively in men ( p = 0.009 for non-traumatized vs traumatized men after post hoc comparisons on an almost significant sex*trauma interaction: F 1,124 = 3.79, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.03; Fig. 1A ) without affecting women.

Higher TGF-beta was predicted by less previous hospitalizations (p<0.001) and lower BPRS score (0.034), while longer duration of illness was almost significant predictor (p=0.054).

neoformans (F = 16.456, p < 0.001) and an almost significant difference for C. gattii (F = 4.980, p = 0.054).

An almost significant difference in reaction times on Test 1 was found between low AP/high RP and high AP/high RP at p = .054.

While we did not find a significant genotype effect in the F0 generation, an almost significant genotype × sex difference was found ( p = 0.054).

An ANOVA showed an almost significant treatment effect ( F = (2, 26) = 3.26; P = 0.054), an effect of FR-value ( F (15, 195) = 54.38; P < 0.01) and a significant FR-value × treatment interaction ( F (30, 390) = 2.52; P < 0.01).

In contrast, EXE 4 positively correlated with blood eosinophils and we found a trend toward a positive correlation with ALT and toward an almost significant negative correlation with hemoglobin ( r = −0.339, P ‐value = 0.054).

Table 3 demonstrates differences with respect to radiological findings. Correlation between tumor volume and NPI A secondary analysis investigated the relationship between tumor volume and NPI values, revealing an almost significant negative correlation (rs = −0.7; p = 0.054), indicating that larger tumor volumes tended to be associated with lower NPI scores.

MET Analyses revealed an almost significant Treatment Condition effect on Explicit (p = .054) and a significant effect on Implicit (p = .026) Emotional Empathy.