Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
There was a significant difference between the follow‐ups before the intervention on the one hand and after 1 week and 9 months on the other hand for the three groups ( p > 0.05), except for the comparison between T 0 and T 4 in the RM‐GIC group, where the difference was almost significant ( p = 0.053).
almost significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Expression of MDL1 and MDL1AS in LARC Patients Predict 5-Year Survival Given the differential expression of MDL1AS between rectal cancer cells and the surrounding normal tissue ( Figure 1 A) and that the differences in levels of expression for this lncRNA were almost significant in patients with long survival when compared to those with lower survival ( p = 0.053, Table 1 ), we decided to study more deeply the connections between the expression of MDL1/MDL1AS and LARC patient survival.
almost significantP = 0.0531.1× alphagold
The difference between TESE+ and TESE− patients in the proportion of inhibin B plasma concentrations below the limit of quantification was not significant, in the whole population ( P = 0.053) or in the Young ( P = 0.054) or the Adult cohort ( P = 0.629); in contrast, the difference for AMH was significant for the whole population ( P = 0.014), almost significant in the Young cohort ( P = 0.053), but not in the Adult cohort ( P = 0.198).
almost significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Four further three-way interactions, of n -1 validity × task/response repetition × n -SR congruence, F (2, 44) = 3.55, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.14, of n- validity × task/response repetition × n -SR congruence, F (2, 44) = 7.02, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.24, of n- validity × n -1 SR congruence × n -SR congruence, F (1, 22) = 5.94, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.21, and of task/response repetition × n -1 SR congruence × n -SR congruence, F (2, 44) = 71.91, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.77, were all qualified by an almost significant five-way interaction, F (2, 44) = 3.14, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.13, and are only analyzed and discussed for their implications for the validity-sequence effect.
almost significantp = .0531.1× alphagold
This main effect was qualified by an almost significant interaction, F (1, 15) = 4.41, p = .053, partial η 2 = .227 (see Figure 4 ). t-test results showed that vocal RTs to Positive Words preceded by Symmetric dot-patterns were faster, ( M = 471; SE = 13) than vocal RTs to Negative Words preceded by Symmetric dot-patterns, ( M = 495; SE = 16), t (15) = 4.71 p <.000.