Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend towards significance”

2,761 sentences · 2,761 papers · 3,605 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend towards significancep = 0.0641.3× alpha
However, the similarly expected correlation between Cho/NAA in the right CST and left finger tap rate has a trend towards significance (p = 0.064), possibly due to a slightly less number of patients with left upper limb weakness included in this study (10 patients with left upper limb weakness versus 13 patients with right upper limb weakness).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0641.3× alpha
Between group effects revealed a significant difference for negative Video 5 (F(1,24) = 4.26, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.15, TS mean = 0.90, SD = 0.21, TD mean = 1.11, SD = 0.30) and a trend towards significance and a medium effect size for negative Video 2 (F(1,24) = 3.77, p = 0.064, partial η 2 = 0.14, mean TS = 0.88, SD = 0.43, TD mean = 1.25, SD = 0.53).
Empathic Accuracy in Adolescent Girls with Turner Syndrome.
J Autism Dev Disord · 2022 · PMC9021071
a trend towards significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Statistical Analysis of Mutation Frequencies The statistical analysis comparing mutation frequencies between CMML-2 and the other stages (CMML-1 and AML transformation) revealed that the TET2 mutation showed a trend towards significance when compared with CMML-1 ( p = 0.065).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Further 2×2 ANOVAs performed on synapse density from the other spines categories failed to show an effect of plannexin or water maze training or their interaction [but note that a trend towards significance was found for plannexin treatment to reduce thin synapses (F 1,12 = 4.57, p = 0.065)].
a trend towards significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
As shown in Table 2 , both the HDRS-21 and CGI mean scores in the ACTIVE group decreased compared to SHAM by the end of rTMS treatment (Visit 5; HDRS-21: significant within subject interaction of visit × treatment F (1,20) = 7.90, p = 0.011; and a significant between-subject effect of treatment F (1,20) = 6.32, p = 0.021; CGI: a trend towards significance within subject effect of visit F (1,20) = 3.82, p = 0.065, a trend towards significance interaction of visit × treatment F (1,20) = 4.23, p = 0.053).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Post hoc tests revealed that NORAD was significantly more abundant in C9ORF72 biological group as compared with NC (0.014±0.01 versus 0.0038±0.00391-fold regulation, t(99) = –2.49, p = 0.041), but stratifying according to genetic status, the comparison between NC and C9ORF72 SMC showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.065), suggesting potentially meaningful differences ( Fig. 3 ).