Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend towards significance”

2,761 sentences · 2,761 papers · 3,605 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Of the 12 markers evaluated, the median unstimulated, antigen stimulated, or antigen-specific levels of seven (IFN-α2, IL-1Ra, IP-10, sCD40L, VEGF, MCP-3, IFN-γ) were either significantly different between the two groups or showed trends ( Table 2 ): the unstimulated levels of IFN-α2 and IL-1Ra were significantly higher (p<0.05) in children without TB disease, while the median unstimulated levels of IP-10 and sCD40L were significantly higher in those with disease, with the difference in the unstimulated levels of VEGF (higher in TB) and MCP-3 (higher in non-TB) showing a trend towards significance (p = 0.06 and 0.07 respectively) ( Table 2 ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
A trend towards significance was found for real excitatory HF rTMS or iTBS vs sham in reducing anxiety at the end of treatment (MD = − 0.36; 95% CI − 0.73, 0.02; p = 0.06), but not at 1-month follow-up.
a trend towards significancep = 0.0611.2× alpha
SN ANOVA test identified significant effects of drug treatment on the levels of p-Akt ( F 3, 21 = 4.243, p = 0.020) and the ratio of p-Akt/Akt ( F 3, 21 = 4.243, p = 0.020) in the SN; ANOVA analysis also indicated a trend towards significance on the levels of p-GSK3β ( F 3, 20 = 2.946, p = 0.061).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0611.2× alpha
Finally, there was a trend towards significance for the 3-way interaction including the quadratic component (F(1,13) = 3.54, p = 0.061), which could be explained by a larger active vs. sham decrease of the (negative) quadratic coefficient for rhythmic than for sham stimulation (p < 0.05; CI = [−0.26 −0.03]; d = 0.76; B U[−0.10 0.24] = 2.26; both active vs. sham differences being significant when tested separately, p < 0.01; for rhythmic: d = 1.34; for random: d = 1.14).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0611.2× alpha
Correlation of CRP with clinical and laboratory variables CRP level, inflammation biomarker indicating the risk of atheroma plaque formation [ 22 ], was significantly correlated with age ( r = 0.194, p = 0.043), obesity ( r = 0.225, p = 0.022), and HbA 1c ( r = 0.154, p = 0.005), indicating a trend towards significance with Lp(a) ( r = 0.295, p = 0.061) in the patient group.