“a trend toward significance”

Several of these differences reached statistical significance or showed a trend toward significance (p < 0.10).

For the auditory condition, significant correlations are shown for all the measures of reading and for phoneme deletion, with a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) for the phonological memory and rapid naming measures.

B6J males had significantly shorter latencies on Day 5 of acquisition testing ( F 1,182 = 4.29; p < 0.05), a trend toward significance on Day 6 of reversal testing ( F 1,148 = 2.76; p < 0.1) and significantly shorter latencies on Days 4 ( F 1,143 = 3.77; p < 0.05) and 5 ( F 1,143 = 7.29; p < 0.01) of shift-reduced testing after correcting for speed as a covariate.

Data sets was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc differences were evaluated using a Tukey’s test (significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05 and a trend toward significance was defined as 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10).

Variables demonstrating a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariable analysis were entered into multivariable models using a backward stepwise approach, while age, stage, and ECOG performance status were additionally forced into the multivariable models due to their well-established clinical relevance in SCLC, and results were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Significance was set at p < 0.05, while a trend toward significance was considered for 0.05 < p < 0.10.

Variables that were significantly different or showed a trend toward significance (p<0.10) between treatment groups at baseline were included as potential confounding factors.

Furthermore, there was a trend toward significance for the PSFS ( F 2,16 =2.68; P =.10; η 2 g =0.21) (see Figure 7 for courses of functional improvement and Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1 for the frequency and improvements of the most common activities listed).

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was considered at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

Variables showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in univariable analysis were retained for multivariable modeling.

Likewise, in the presence of AS-1, there was a trend toward significance for IL-1β to decrease the mean sIPSC amplitude in the majority of CeA neurons (84.81% ± 7.35% of AS-1 baseline, n = 5 out of 6 cells; one-sample t -test, p = 0.10; Figure 3 D).

Significant differences were determined at P < 0.05 and a trend toward significance considered at P ≤ 0.10.

Linear effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and a trend toward significance when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

A multivariate linear regression model was subsequently constructed using the backward stepwise selection method, initially including all variables with significance ( p < 0.05) or a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis.

Statistically significant p-values are shown in bold and underlined when they are below 0.05 or only in bold if a trend toward significance is observed (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1).

In addition to these univariate analyses, clinical outcomes were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, correcting for risk factors that showed at least a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis.

Only three colon metabolite features showed a trend toward significance ( P ≤ 0.1) in the comparisons between the control and BPA groups.

Predictors of response In univariate analysis, platinum sensitivity (compared to platinum resistant population) was a significant covariate ( p < 0.01) affecting best tumor response by RECIST, whereas ABT-767 dose and BRCA mutational status (germline compared to non-germline) showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) (Supplemental Fig. 3 ).

A trend toward significance ( P < 0.10) was observed for the NCLR ( P = 0.05).

Additionally, threonic acid, L-proline, N-oleyl-leucine, harman, and L-ornithine showed a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1, t -test) between the placebo group and the Probiotic group at the 4-week endpoint ( Fig. 7B ).

Moreover, four LCFAs and one VLCFA, namely arachidic acid, cis -11-eicosenoic acid, cis -11,14-eicosadienoic acid, cis -5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid, and lignoceric acid, showed a trend toward significance (0.05 < p < 0.1).

All reported results were considered to be significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level and were considered a trend toward significance at p ≤ 0.10.

If the ANOVA results were statistically significant ( P < 0.05) or showed a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1), we proceeded with Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test unless otherwise stated.

However, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.1), suggesting a potential association warranting further study.

Differences between significant means were considered as statistically different at P < 0.05 and a trend toward significance at P < 0.10.