At baseline, there was no significant difference between the three intervention groups for t-tau, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio or BDNF, although there was a trend toward significance for a group difference between baseline ratios of Aβ42/Aβ40 (one-way ANOVA, F 1,36 = 3.14, p = 0.06).
There was a trend toward significance of the mean FOGQ score in EOFOG (12.37 ± 1.99 vs. 11.42 ± 1.57, P = 0.06).
Here, the model was driven by the use of a walking aid (β = −0.30, p = 0.03) with lower STV in patients without walking aid compared to patients with a walking aid, with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.45, p = 0.0003, Figure 3B ), and a trend toward significance in the gender parameter with lower STV in women compared to men (β = −0.24, p = 0.06), with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.36, p = 0.005, Figure 3B ).
There was a trend toward significance ( P = 0.06) between the average change in signal intensity from the entire brain minus the ventricular system for rats maintained in the light ( n = 6) versus dark ( n = 6), shown in Fig. 1 B .
Trim-and-fill analysis and Egger regression revealed that some studies on the left side of the distribution may be missing from the literature, though the result from the Egger regression was only a trend toward significance (Egger regression p = 0.06; Figure 4B ).
There was a trend toward significance with hematuria going down from 23 red blood cells per high-powered field to 11 red blood cells per high-powered field ( P = 0.06).
Satiety A statistically significant main effect was observed for hunger ( p = 0.002), and a trend toward significance was noted with the overall appetite score ( p = 0.06) among the T2DM participants.
Although diabetes mellitus showed a trend toward significance (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.97–3.15, p = 0.06), it did not reach statistical significance after adjustment.
15.0%), with a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).
Interaction analysis between DNVs and PE exposure revealed a trend toward significance in SRS ( β =-4.17, P =0.06).
When comparing the gain obtained between T 0 and T 2 between the two groups, a statistically significant difference was noted for the threshold ( p = 0.05) and a trend toward significance was noted for the TDI ( p = 0.06) and the identification ( p = 0.07), all in favour of fSRP ( Fig. 2 ; Table 4 ).
Consistent with our hypothesis, post-CN-NINM training fMRI shows significant increases in BOLD signal in the left DLPFC ( t = 3.55, p = 0.01), dACC ( t = 3.057, p = 0.02) and a trend toward significance in the right DLPFC ( t = 2.3, p = 0.06).
A trend toward significance was found between DAO and WMH load ( P = 0.06) in stroke patients.
There was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06) for increased induction of labor in the post-implementation group.
We found that there were no differences in nonadherence to laboratory testing for all laboratory tests, although there was a trend toward significance for anti-dsDNA testing (4/136, 2.9% nonadherence for in-person visits vs 13/153, 8.5% nonadherence for telemedicine visits; P =.06; Table 4 ), but it was not statistically significant.
Between-group differences in relative changes (Δ0-12 months/0 months) were observed for MA ( P = .03), OHP ( P = .001), clot lysis ( P = .008), and fibrinogen ( P < 0.001), with a trend toward significance for V max ( P = .06; Figure ).
These results are consistent with biomembrane force probe (BFP) 2D affinity measurements of the 3.L2 TCR that showed no contribution of CD4 to the agonist Hb:I-E k pMHCII, but a significant contribution to binding of an antagonist (I72) pMHCII and a trend toward significance with a weak agonist ligand (T72; p = 0.06) ( Hong et al., 2015 ).
A two‐way ANOVA performed in all groups showed a nonsignificant effect of drug (F1, 36) = 0.1) but a significant effect of stress (F(1, 36) = 11.3; P = 0.01) and a trend toward significance on the interaction between factors (F(2, 36) = 3.59; P = 0.06).
A positive correlation was also observed between postoperative CCT and ΔARTh in the SMILE group ( r = 0.46, P = 0.03), with a trend toward significance in the LASEK group ( r = 0.40, P = 0.06) (Table 5 ).
Thus, while controls showed differentiation between Show and No-Show events in the Human Opponent runs as expected (this difference in the Computer Opponent runs showed significance on the right MTG: t = 2.62, p = 0.01 and only a trend toward significance on the left ( t = 2.04, p = 0.06)), ASD subjects showed no differentiation between the Human Show and No-Show conditions with a much weaker main effect of Opponent Type (due to a differentiation between the Computer Show and No-Show events; see Fig. 3 C and D). 3.2.3.
Alike clearance of LPS in vivo ( Figures 6 A and 6B), the LPS endocytosis by LSEC was studied using 125 I-labeled LPS in vitro ( Figure 6 D), and we found that LPS endocytosis was significantly decreased in LSEC from Stab2 KO and DK mice, and a trend toward significance in Stab1 LSEC compared with WT LSEC ( Figure 6 D); p-value = 0.06.
Regarding CRP levels, we found a trend toward significance in the association with lower SWS (p = 0.06) after adjustment.
A family history of atopy demonstrated a trend toward significance among children without previous anaphylaxis ( p = 0.06), similarly to multi-food allergy in the same patient group ( p = 0.07).
Across the 2 surveys, the lowest mean score on usefulness statements (4.46, SD 1.38) was in response to “Using the ECHO framework makes it easier to do my job,” while the highest mean score (5.23, SD 1.33) was for “Using the ECHO framework for cybersecurity improves the quality of work I do.” In comparing responses to “Using the ECHO framework for cybersecurity improves the quality of the work I do” between participants in HICs and LMICs between 1- and 3-month surveys, there was a trend toward significance in the LMIC subgroup analysis over time ( P =.06), where the mean Likert score reduced from 6.12 (SD 0.99) to 4.42 (SD 1.90; Figure 4 ), but this was not statistically significant.
To evaluate the significant between group differences, we performed independent t-test comparisons and found a significant difference between the two groups for CTOA100 (HP:69.15%, LP:62.18%), t (51) = 2.26, p = .02, and a trend toward significance for the CTOA300 (HP: 49.88%, LP: 41.20%), t (51) = 1.90, p = .06, and CTOA500 (HP: 41.95%, LP: 33.04%), t (51) = 1.7, p = .09, conditions.