“a trend toward significance”

There was a trend toward significance in the same direction for TMTA (time) (p = 0.06).

In addition, we observed a trend toward significance in the alpha band ( p = 0.06). 3.6 Correlation of boost score between recording or stimulation and coagulation site Contact pairs involved in significantly changed connections following RFTC showed higher maximal correlation between either stimulation or recording boost score and coagulation site in the delta band (Figure 4B ). 3.7 CCEP reproducibility The mean percentage of significantly different connections between identical stimulation sessions was 10.26% (8.41%–13.26%).

Comorbidities were significantly associated with complications (ρ = 0.189, p = 0.028; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.045), while postoperative complications showed a strong correlation with diabetes (ρ = 0.213, p = 0.012) and a trend toward significance for vascular disease (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.06).

Luminance standard deviation showed a trend toward significance ( F (2,123) = 2.96, p = 0.06) but did not exceed the conventional threshold.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06) ( Supplementary Figure 1 ).

There was a trend toward significance ( P = 0.06) between the average change in signal intensity from the entire brain minus the ventricular system for rats maintained in the light ( n = 6) versus dark ( n = 6), shown in Fig. 1 B .

The univariate analysis demonstrated a trend toward significance with pre-SABR chemotherapy for distant metastases (HR: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.04; P = .06) and 4 metastases versus 1 metastasis (HR: 8.91; 95% CI, 0.90-87.90; P = .06).

There was a trend toward significance with hematuria going down from 23 red blood cells per high-powered field to 11 red blood cells per high-powered field ( P = 0.06).

Regarding the delayed recall of the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure, results indicated no main effect of group [ F (1, 64) = 0.46, p = 0.5]; a trend toward significance for the main effect of age [ F (1, 64) = 3.6, p = 0.06]; and no interaction effect [ F (1, 64) = 1.2, p = 0.3].

There was a trend toward significance (p < 0.06) in New Jersey subjects as to a greater psychological impact from the hurricane.

Here, the model was driven by the use of a walking aid (β = −0.30, p = 0.03) with lower STV in patients without walking aid compared to patients with a walking aid, with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.45, p = 0.0003, Figure 3B ), and a trend toward significance in the gender parameter with lower STV in women compared to men (β = −0.24, p = 0.06), with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.36, p = 0.005, Figure 3B ).

We did however observe a significant variation in the lymphocyte expression of TGFB1 in these groups and a trend toward significance for the expression of KLRC1 (p = 0.06) and BTP (p = 0.09).

To evaluate the significant between group differences, we performed independent t-test comparisons and found a significant difference between the two groups for CTOA100 (HP:69.15%, LP:62.18%), t (51) = 2.26, p = .02, and a trend toward significance for the CTOA300 (HP: 49.88%, LP: 41.20%), t (51) = 1.90, p = .06, and CTOA500 (HP: 41.95%, LP: 33.04%), t (51) = 1.7, p = .09, conditions.

Low sun exposure was reported by 43% of the CRA patients and 21% of the controls, with a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).

Statistically significant negative correlations were observed for Psychosocial Well-being (r = -0.26; P < 0.01), Treatment Satisfaction (r = -0.20; P = 0.03), Acceptance of Insulin Administration (r = -0.21; P = 0.03), and WE-CARE Total Score (r = -0.27; P < 0.01), with a trend toward significance for Ease of Insulin Use (r = -0.18; P = 0.06).

MCT1 protein level remained unchanged after both trainings, although there was a trend toward significance after training in normoxia ( p = .06, Figure 1a ).

Response time increased significantly for both groups in both modalities: TD group–visual [F (2.72) = 7.98, p<0.01, η2 = 0.18] and auditory [F (2,72) = 8.93, p<0.01, η2 = 0.2]; SSD group–visual [F (2,34) = 15.47, p<0.01, η2 = 0.48] and auditory [F (2,34) = 5.52, p<0.01, η2 = 0.25.] Post-hoc analyses using Bonferroni’s adjustment for multiple comparisons revealed that, in the TD group, blocks 1 and 3 were different in the visual modality (p<0.001) and that there was a trend toward significance between blocks 1 and 2 in the auditory modality (p = 0.06).

The SOA × Validity interaction was significant for gaze cue trials, F (1,9) = 6.6, p = 0.03, and for square cue trials, F (1,9) = 27.2, p = 0.001, and there was a trend toward significance for arrow cue trials F (1,9) = 4.5, p = 0.06.

Paired t -tests found SHAPS score to decrease in the placebo group, although not significantly (−1.25 ± 3.77, p = 0.15), but increase in the bupropion group with a trend toward significance (+1.40 ± 3.17, p = 0.06).

ECOG performance status showed a trend toward significance (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.1–1.0; p = 0.06), while histologic subtype demonstrated a borderline association with overall survival (HR 2.0; 95% CI 0.9–4.6; p = 0.07).

Correlation analysis of the pairwise age-matched DLB patient and control subgroup showed that the IL-6 correlation with α-synuclein in patients with DLB stayed significant ( r = 0.601, p = 0.006), whereas the significance between IL-6 and MMSE was lost and only a trend toward significance remained ( r = −0.417, p = 0.060).

Similarly, Glu/Cr remained significant ( P = 0.011) and Glx/Cr showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.06).

15.0%), with a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).

At the end of the intervention, there was a trend toward significance between the arms (unpaired t -test; p -value = 0.06) indicating that the microbiota of those in the probiotic arm may have begun to change from their baseline composition relative to the placebo group.

In DO mice, there was a trend toward significance for the interaction between all three factors (stress × sex × stimuli, F(1,95)=3.62, p = .06) because MSEW females spent less time in the zones that had been paired with social stimuli compared to other groups.