Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = .0521.0× alpha
Exploratory regression analyses showed that total prosthetic satisfaction (tot TAPES) was significantly associated with functional independence (FIM) scores at T1 ( β = .56, p = .019, R 2 = .30), while its association with independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index) showed a trend toward significance ( β = .45, p = .052, R 2 = .28).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.0521.0× alpha
There was a trend toward significance in the comparison of cell concentrations, F (3, 62) = 2.086, P = 0.052, with a high cell concentration of 100,000 cells/μL appearing to have a more significant sparing effect on the total area of surviving tissue compared to untreated lesion controls.
a trend toward significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
Furthermore, the trend toward lower eGFR at 12 months persisted in the sensitivity analysis stratifying cases by imputed versus non-imputed lymphocele volumes, with significant differences observed in imputed cases ( p = 0.031) and a trend toward significance in non-imputed cases ( p = 0.052, Supplementary Fig. 2).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
Differently, the Lows had a larger illusion index in normal waking (2.58 ± 0.46) compared to hypnosis ( p = 0.003, d = 1.12, CI [1.08 4.4]); whereas in the Highs the comparison between the illusion index in normal waking (1.81 ± 0.58) and in hypnosis showed only a trend toward significance ( p = 0.052, d = −0.64, CI [−4.98 0.03]) (Fig. 4B ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
Likewise, CSA at baseline (panel C) were significantly larger on the affected side than on the healthy side for the horizontal canal ( p < 0.001) and showed a trend toward significance for the posterior canal ( p = 0.052), whereas this was not the case for the anterior canal ( p = 0.607).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
In the LTM underpass task, there was a significant main effect of Ogg1 genotype (F(1,34) = 4.70, p < 0.05), a significant main effect of EtOH exposure (F(1,34) = 5.27, p < 0.05), and a trend toward significance for the interaction (F(1,34) = 6.52, p = 0.052).