Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Both WT and Tph1 (−/−) mice were able to learn the association between the stimulus light and reward (session effect: F (12,493) = 93.385; P<0.001) however there was a strong trend indicating that aged Tph1 (−/−) mice may acquire this association slower (age×genotype: F (36, 493) = 1.398; P = 0.06; Figure 3A ).
a strong trendp = .0611.2× alphagold
Additionally, neither GM ( p GM = 0.892) nor sex ( p Sex = 0.951) affected time spent in either chamber of the social preference test overall; however, a post hoc analysis using paired T tests revealed a strong trend toward GM High males exhibiting greater asocial behavior ( p = .061), spending more time in the object zone relative to the stranger zone.
a strong trendp = .0611.2× alphagold
However, traumatic experiences during pushback significantly added to the prediction of depression, accounting for an additional 3.7% of the variance [ F (1,126) = 6 .294, p = .013] over and above traumatic experiences in transit, showed a strong trend-level effect in the prediction of anxiety [ R 2 = .023, F (1,126) = 3 .561, p = .061], and had no incremental value in prediction of PTSD [ R 2 = .008, F (1,126) = 1 .191, p = .277], thus marginally accounting for 2.4% of the variance in overall psychological vulnerability [ F (1,126) = 3 .905, p = .050].
a strong trendp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Effect of GPR37L1KO on the Corticosterone Level after PAT A three-way ANOVA on the level of circulating corticosterone revealed a significant effect of genotype x sex [F (1,54) = 4.04, p = 0.049; Figure 6 ] and a strong trend towards significant effect of genotype [F (1,54) = 3.66, p = 0.061; Figure 6 ], age x sex [F (1,54) = 3.65, p = 0.061; Figure 6 ] with no significant effect observed for other factors ( Figure 6 ).
a strong trendp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Rats injected with the highest (20 mg/kg) dose of KET displayed a strong trend ( p = 0.061) towards a lower proportion of lose–shift behaviors following true negative feedback compared to the control group (statistically significant main effect of treatment ( F (3,25) = 3898, p = 0.021, Fig. 2 b), regardless of the time (1, 24, or 48 h) after injection (non-significant treatment × test interaction ( F (6,50) = 1955, NS).