Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = .061.2× alphagold
3.5 Acoustic startle response and sensorimotor gating The genotype had no impact on the acoustic startle response to various startle pulses [RM ANOVA, ‘genotype’ by ‘startle’: F(2,96) = 1.2, p = .3] but there was a strong trend for a ‘sex’ by ‘startle’ interaction [F(2,96) = 3.0, p = .06] ( Fig 4A ).
a strong trendP = .061.2× alphagold
The significant reduction in AST levels (MD = −6.72 U/L; P = .009), along with a strong trend toward ALT reduction (MD = −10.75 U/L; P = .06), supports improvements in hepatic inflammation.
a strong trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Interestingly, NOD mice treated with BIBO3304 displayed a significant decrease in glucose levels (Placebo, 5.35 ± 0.11 mM; BIBO3304, 5.03 ± 0.09 mM; * P < 0.05), which is associated with a strong trend to increased insulin levels (Placebo, 73.31 ± 9.42 pM; BIBO3304, 103.2 ± 11.87 pM; P = 0.06), indicating that β-cells in a T1D environment are responsive to the inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling.
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results Effect of Ethanol and Acetaldehyde on Trophoblast Invasion SGHPL-4 cells treated with ethanol exhibited no change in invasion through the matrigel-coated membrane barrier ( figure 1a ; p>0.05; N = 6), but it is noteworthy that at the highest concentration, there was a strong trend for reduced in invasion with 40 mM ethanol (p = 0.06; N = 6).
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
HNP 1-3 showed a strong trend (p = 0.06) with a moderate effect size (d = 0.53) at 30 min for the CHO condition [2.001 (1.95) vs 3.037 (2.49) ng/mL], nevertheless, no significant differences were observed at 60 min with respect to the values measured at both pre [3.825 (3.21) vs 2.001 (1.95) ng/mL] and 30 min [3.825 (3.21) vs 3.037 (2.49) ng/mL].
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
This observation was supported by a comparable ANOVA on the regression slopes that indicated a strong trend for a main effect of group, F (1, 51) = 3.7, p = 0.06, such that the regression slopes were smaller for the people with schizophrenia than for the control subjects.