Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a strong trend”

5,726 sentences · 5,726 papers · 7,352 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendP = 0.05831.2× alphagold
However, higher-resolution micro-computed tomography (microCT) measurements of cortical bone in the midshaft of the femur demonstrated that BAY-treated mice had a subtle but significantly greater cortical bone volume fraction ( P = 0.0286; Figure 5B ) as compared with VEH-treated mice, resulting from a strong trend for greater cortical bone volume ( P = 0.0583; Figure 5C ) without an impact on cortical bone tissue volume ( P = 0.2807; Figure 5D ).
a strong trendp = 0.05841.2× alphagold
Similarly, a strong trend for MPTP effect was shown for latency to descend (F = 3.802, p = 0.0584, two-way ANOVA; Figure 2 G), but not for treatment or interaction (F = 0.843, p = 0.438 and F = 0.855, p = 0.433, respectively).
a strong trendp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
However, a statistically significant effect was not observed when confounding effects of age were taken into account; there was a strong trend towards an increase in FH activity with age ( p = 0.059) although the trend was less marked in MS-MSC ( Figure 2(b) ).
a strong trendP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Importantly, we also found that larger stressor-related increases in cortisol (AUCi in the stress group) were associated with greater susceptibility to false memory; false recognition showed a strong trend ( r = 0.33, P = 0.059), while bias to critical lures ( r = 0.42, P = 0.02) was positively correlated to AUCi ( Fig. 3 ).
a strong trendp -value = 0.0591.2× alphagold
In addition, compared to 1935/1936, the 2020 bumblebee communities that belonged to group B had a significantly shorter Proboscis length ( p -value = 0.023, Figure 6 b) and showed a strong trend towards smaller worker body size ( p -value = 0.059, Figure 6 a) and an indiscriminate macroclimatic preference ( p -value = 0.082, Figure 6 k).
a strong trendp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Post-hoc tests on AUC error (Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons) following a significant Task*Stimulation Group interaction; F(2, 86) = 15.33, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.26, revealed this trend was significant between the cerebellar and M1 group ( p = 0.019) while a strong trend was found for the cerebellar and sham group difference ( p = 0.059).